[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-11779) CLI ignores -m parameter if high-availability is ZOOKEEPER

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17183250#comment-17183250 ] Aljoscha Krettek commented on FLINK-11779: -- Agreed, I think we need to make thi

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-11779) CLI ignores -m parameter if high-availability is ZOOKEEPER

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17174087#comment-17174087 ] Yang Wang commented on FLINK-11779: --- I second [~maguowei]'s comments. AFAIK, the {{-m

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-11779) CLI ignores -m parameter if high-availability is ZOOKEEPER

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17173995#comment-17173995 ] Guowei Ma commented on FLINK-11779: --- # What I understand is that the rest server shoul

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-11779) CLI ignores -m parameter if high-availability is ZOOKEEPER

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17165676#comment-17165676 ] Aljoscha Krettek commented on FLINK-11779: -- And {{jobmanager.rpc.address}}? Tha

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-11779) CLI ignores -m parameter if high-availability is ZOOKEEPER

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17165666#comment-17165666 ] Chesnay Schepler commented on FLINK-11779: -- [~aljoscha] {{rest.address}} is onl

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-11779) CLI ignores -m parameter if high-availability is ZOOKEEPER

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17165650#comment-17165650 ] Aljoscha Krettek commented on FLINK-11779: -- Turns out this is a smidge more com

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-11779) CLI ignores -m parameter if high-availability is ZOOKEEPER

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16786794#comment-16786794 ] Till Rohrmann commented on FLINK-11779: --- I agree that the behavior is not intuitiv

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-11779) CLI ignores -m parameter if high-availability is ZOOKEEPER

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16784722#comment-16784722 ] Gary Yao commented on FLINK-11779: -- The current behavior already gives precedence to Zo

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-11779) CLI ignores -m parameter if high-availability is ZOOKEEPER

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16784645#comment-16784645 ] TisonKun commented on FLINK-11779: -- Oops, it's my misunderstanding. For respecting the

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-11779) CLI ignores -m parameter if high-availability is ZOOKEEPER

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16784246#comment-16784246 ] Gary Yao commented on FLINK-11779: -- [~Tison] I am not sure what you are proposing. It d

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-11779) CLI ignores -m parameter if high-availability is ZOOKEEPER

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16784201#comment-16784201 ] TisonKun commented on FLINK-11779: -- [~gjy] Isn't "-m" ignored because it is run in a y