Github user denalex commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hawq/pull/1353
@sansanichfb -- can you please approve the PR if it looks good to you ? We
are planning to commit it soon.
---
Github user leskin-in commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hawq/pull/1353
Hi @sansanichfb,
You have mentioned some questions that were not replied. I am a bit
confused; could you clarify what exactly is unclear or should be corrected?
I have also lef
Github user sansanichfb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hawq/pull/1353
Hi @kapustor ,
Sorry for the late reply.
I don't have any new comments, there are couple old comments, which weren't
replied.
Apart from that - looks good.
---
Github user kapustor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hawq/pull/1353
Hi @sansanichfb,
Any news on this PR?
---
Github user kapustor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hawq/pull/1353
Hi @sansanichfb
We've removed the notification about the consistency and transactions from
the error text.
Thank you!
---
Github user sansanichfb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hawq/pull/1353
@kapustor we can't fail safely when something wrong happens with at least
one fragment, without dealing with the complexity of distributed transactions.
So transaction handling doesn'
Github user kapustor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hawq/pull/1353
Hi @sansanichfb!
> Also, I am wondering, which target database patch was tested against? The
transactional approach doesn't seem clear to me - if DB doesn't support
transactions -
Github user sansanichfb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hawq/pull/1353
Good job leskin-in! I left some comments. Also, I am wondering, which
target database patch was tested against? The transactional approach doesn't
seem clear to me - if DB doesn't suppor
Github user kongyew commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hawq/pull/1353
**This JDBC profile is not officially supported** by Greenplum since it is
not tested at all. Use it at your own risks. The interface maybe changed in
the future since the current profile
Github user deem0n commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hawq/pull/1353
Yep, our customers have plenty different data sources, mostly JDBC
compliant. This feature makes GPDB a very flexible and friendly player in
corporate IT landscape.
---
Github user mebelousov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hawq/pull/1353
This is great feature.
We really need to upload data from Greenplum to other databases.
---
11 matches
Mail list logo
