[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977685#action_12977685
]
ryan rawson commented on HBASE-3413:
how would we ensure the uuid would be generated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977689#action_12977689
]
Mathias Herberts commented on HBASE-3413:
-
The idea of using a UUID was to be able
When scanners have readers updated we should use original file selection
algorithm rather than include all files
Key: HBASE-3415
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jonathan Gray updated HBASE-3415:
-
Attachment: HBASE-3415-v1.patch
First go. There are other bugs in this code and updating
For intra-row scanning, the update readers notification resets the query
matcher and can lead to incorrect behavior
---
Key: HBASE-3416
URL:
CacheOnWrite is using the temporary output path for block names, need to use a
more consistent block naming scheme
--
Key: HBASE-3417
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977815#action_12977815
]
stack commented on HBASE-3415:
--
Am I missing something? You remove the getScanner(scan,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-3406:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.90.0)
0.90.1
Moving to 0.90.1
I cannot explain how in-memory
Increment operations can break when qualifiers are split between
memstore/snapshot and storefiles
-
Key: HBASE-3418
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jonathan Gray updated HBASE-3418:
-
Attachment: HBASE-3418-v1.patch
Unit test which reproduces bad behavior and small fix which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977864#action_12977864
]
Todd Lipcon commented on HBASE-3418:
Can we put this in 0.90? seems like inaccurate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jonathan Gray updated HBASE-3418:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.90.1)
0.90.0
Yeah, looks like we're doing at least
If re-transition to OPENING during log replay fails, server aborts. Instead,
should just cancel region open.
-
Key: HBASE-3419
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977870#action_12977870
]
Jonathan Gray commented on HBASE-3419:
--
Currently the tickle happens on a
Handling a big rebalance, we can queue multiple instances of a Close event;
messes up state
---
Key: HBASE-3420
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3420
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Daniel Cryans resolved HBASE-3412.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jean-Daniel Cryans
Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977890#action_12977890
]
stack commented on HBASE-3420:
--
Its timeout of a close. Here is sequence:
{code}
2011-01-05
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977896#action_12977896
]
stack commented on HBASE-3418:
--
+1 on patch.
Increment operations can break when qualifiers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977897#action_12977897
]
stack commented on HBASE-3420:
--
Looking more, the CLOSED event had been queued over on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-3420:
-
Attachment: 3420.txt
This should address most egregious issue turned up by these logs. Other things
to add are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977906#action_12977906
]
Jonathan Gray commented on HBASE-3420:
--
So this just updates the timestamp. Seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977929#action_12977929
]
stack commented on HBASE-3420:
--
@Ted Balancing works differently in 0.90. Where before, when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977930#action_12977930
]
Jonathan Gray commented on HBASE-3420:
--
It's unrelated to the notion of checkins
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977943#action_12977943
]
Jonathan Gray commented on HBASE-3417:
--
One idea from discussion with stack is to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977968#action_12977968
]
stack commented on HBASE-3420:
--
Ok... with this patch in place, master was able to join the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack resolved HBASE-3420.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.90.1)
0.90.0
Assignee: stack
Very wide rows -- 30M plus -- cause us OOME
---
Key: HBASE-3421
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3421
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.90.0
Reporter:
Balancer will willing try to rebalance thousands of regions in one go; needs an
upper bound added.
--
Key: HBASE-3422
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977981#action_12977981
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-3409:
---
Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #1703 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977978#action_12977978
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-3412:
---
Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #1703 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977979#action_12977979
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-3402:
---
Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #1703 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977983#action_12977983
]
stack commented on HBASE-3419:
--
Chatting about this up on IRC, the tickle does not happen if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jonathan Gray reassigned HBASE-3419:
Assignee: Jonathan Gray
Working on implementing what stack outlined above.
If
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978016#action_12978016
]
Nicolas Spiegelberg commented on HBASE-3421:
Note that you can limit the number
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jonathan Gray updated HBASE-3419:
-
Attachment: HBASE-3419-v1.patch
As outlined.
Had to add new {{CancelableProgressable}}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978035#action_12978035
]
stack commented on HBASE-3403:
--
bq. + cluster.getMaster().catalogJanitorSwitch(false);
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jonathan Gray updated HBASE-3419:
-
Attachment: HBASE-3419-v2.patch
Squashed the v1 patch with another patch. v2 is just this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978054#action_12978054
]
Nicolas Spiegelberg commented on HBASE-3421:
For interested parties...
From:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jonathan Gray updated HBASE-3417:
-
Attachment: HBASE-3417-v1.patch
Changes storefile names to be UUIDs. Makes it so we use the
hbase-env.sh over-rides HBASE_OPTS incorrectly.
---
Key: HBASE-3423
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3423
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.90.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jonathan Gray updated HBASE-3417:
-
Attachment: HBASE-3417-v2.patch
Makes it so we don't have to parse fileName for each block when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978122#action_12978122
]
stack commented on HBASE-3417:
--
As discussed up on IRC, this is not backward compatible:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978124#action_12978124
]
Jonathan Gray commented on HBASE-3417:
--
I changed regex to be {{([0-9a-z]+)}}
I kind
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978125#action_12978125
]
Jonathan Gray commented on HBASE-3417:
--
Old random file name was using rand.nextLong()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978156#action_12978156
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-3420:
---
Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #1705 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978157#action_12978157
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-3423:
---
Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #1705 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978160#action_12978160
]
Hairong Kuang commented on HBASE-3379:
--
Stack, HBASE-3285 should be able to fix the
47 matches
Mail list logo
