[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
rajeshbabu updated HBASE-6060:
--
Attachment: 6060_suggestion_toassign_rs_wentdown_beforerequest.patch
Regions's in OPENING state
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13292474#comment-13292474
]
rajeshbabu commented on HBASE-6060:
---
@Ram
Attached patch. Just a suggestion to skip the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13292475#comment-13292475
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
bq. But the gain with bulk assignment is its faster which we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13292476#comment-13292476
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
@rajeshbabu So, you are allowing the single-assign to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13292479#comment-13292479
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-6060:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13292530#comment-13292530
]
Zhihong Ted Yu commented on HBASE-6060:
---
For
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matteo Bertozzi updated HBASE-4791:
---
Attachment: HBASE-4791-v0.patch
I've attached a first draft patch that allows Master, Region
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shahin Saneinejad updated HBASE-4368:
-
Attachment: HBASE-4368.patch
Attached a patch, I'd appreciate any feedback.
I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13292549#comment-13292549
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-6060:
---
@Ted
Myself or Rajesh,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13292589#comment-13292589
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
Rajesh says:
bq. Lets suppose Region server went down after
Xing Shi created HBASE-6195:
---
Summary: Increment data will lost when the memstore flushed
Key: HBASE-6195
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6195
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13292625#comment-13292625
]
Xing Shi commented on HBASE-6195:
-
Here is the data:
I delete the row first, and then use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13292626#comment-13292626
]
Xing Shi commented on HBASE-6195:
-
Oh sorry, there is no delete in my test case.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xing Shi updated HBASE-6195:
Attachment: HBASE-6195-trunk.patch
The patch.
Increment data will lost when the memstore
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xing Shi updated HBASE-6195:
Attachment: HBASE-6195-trunk-V2.patch
The previous patch didn't mv the now variable into the lock, fix it.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13292646#comment-13292646
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-6060:
---
@Stack
Few comments,
First
16 matches
Mail list logo