[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7103) Need to fail split if SPLIT znode is deleted even before the split is completed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13495141#comment-13495141 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-7103: -- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results o

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6721) RegionServer Group based Assignment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13495129#comment-13495129 ] Francis Liu commented on HBASE-6721: {quote} Should we confine these special tables to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7103) Need to fail split if SPLIT znode is deleted even before the split is completed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13495120#comment-13495120 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-7103: --- Attached patch for trunk an

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7103) Need to fail split if SPLIT znode is deleted even before the split is completed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HBASE-7103: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Need to fail split if SPLIT znode is

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7103) Need to fail split if SPLIT znode is deleted even before the split is completed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HBASE-7103: -- Attachment: HBASE-7103_trunk.patch > Need to fail split if SPLIT znode is d

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7103) Need to fail split if SPLIT znode is deleted even before the split is completed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HBASE-7103: -- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Need to fail split if SPLIT znode is

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7103) Need to fail split if SPLIT znode is deleted even before the split is completed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HBASE-7103: -- Attachment: HBASE-7103_0.94.patch > Need to fail split if SPLIT znode is de

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7103) Need to fail split if SPLIT znode is deleted even before the split is completed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13495101#comment-13495101 ] stack commented on HBASE-7103: -- +1 on patch. There is still a hole in here (deleting a znode

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6793) Make hbase-examples module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13495103#comment-13495103 ] stack commented on HBASE-6793: -- [~ted_yu] Make a new issue I'd say. > Make h

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5898) Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13495098#comment-13495098 ] stack commented on HBASE-5898: -- Seems fine by me Lars. > Consider double-che

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5898) Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13495053#comment-13495053 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-5898: -- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results o

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-4913) Per-CF compaction Via the Shell

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13495051#comment-13495051 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-4913: -- Patch looks good +1 (for 0.94.3 if committed

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6775) Use ZK.multi when available for HBASE-6710 0.92/0.94 compatibility fix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13495048#comment-13495048 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-6775: -- I'd be OK with punting on this for 0.92 and 0

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7103) Need to fail split if SPLIT znode is deleted even before the split is completed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13495040#comment-13495040 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-7103: -- Also a trunk patch would be awesome so we can

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5898) Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-5898: - Attachment: 5898-v3.txt Version that fixes TestStoreFile (by using getMissCachingCount() instead

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5898) Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13495032#comment-13495032 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-5898: -- TestStoreFile fails because it checks CacheSt

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6721) RegionServer Group based Assignment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13495015#comment-13495015 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-6721: --- More comments about GroupBasedLoadBalancer. In randomAssign

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5898) Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13495013#comment-13495013 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-5898: -- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results o

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7142) TestSplitLogManager#testDeadWorker may fail because of hard limit on the TimeoutMonitor's timeout period

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13495010#comment-13495010 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-7142: --- Integrated in HBase-0.94 #579 (See [https://builds.apache.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6721) RegionServer Group based Assignment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13495007#comment-13495007 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-6721: --- I went over GroupBasedLoadBalancer. In correctAssignments()

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7103) Need to fail split if SPLIT znode is deleted even before the split is completed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13495008#comment-13495008 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-7103: -- This is not really my area of expertise, but

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5898) Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-5898: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5898) Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-5898: - Attachment: 5898-v2.txt Last try. > Consider double-checked locking for block ca

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5898) Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-5898: - Attachment: (was: 5898-v2.txt) > Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock > -

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5898) Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-5898: - Attachment: (was: 5898-v2.txt) > Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock > -

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5898) Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-5898: - Status: Open (was: Patch Available) I can't make patches. > Consider double-che

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5898) Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-5898: - Attachment: 5898-v2.txt Figured my confusion. Took the patch from the wrong directory. This versi

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7101) HBase stuck in Region SPLIT

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-7101: - Fix Version/s: (was: 0.94.3) 0.94.4 Pushing to 0.94.4 after all.

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5898) Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-5898: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Arggh... NM. This is the right patch. > Con

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5898) Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-5898: - Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Oops. No, not quite the same. > Consider do

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5898) Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-5898: - Attachment: 5898-v2.txt Rebased trunk patch. (want to get 0.94.3 RC out) > Consi

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6642) enable_all,disable_all,drop_all can call "list" command with regex directly.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13494995#comment-13494995 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-6642: -- Should we also fix the misleading messaging?

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-7142) TestSplitLogManager#testDeadWorker may fail because of hard limit on the TimeoutMonitor's timeout period

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl resolved HBASE-7142. -- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Committed to 0.94. Thanks for the patch Himanshu

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-7142) TestSplitLogManager#testDeadWorker may fail because of hard limit on the TimeoutMonitor's timeout period

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl reassigned HBASE-7142: Assignee: Himanshu Vashishtha > TestSplitLogManager#testDeadWorker may fail because of

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6793) Make hbase-examples module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13494916#comment-13494916 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-6793: --- Trunk build 3530 got to building hbase-examples module but

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7143) TestMetaMigrationRemovingHTD fails when used with Hadoop 0.23/2.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-7143: -- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) TestMetaMigrationConvertingToPB passed in Je

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7143) TestMetaMigrationRemovingHTD fails when used with Hadoop 0.23/2.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13494911#comment-13494911 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-7143: --- Integrated in HBase-0.94 #578 (See [https://builds.apache.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7143) TestMetaMigrationRemovingHTD fails when used with Hadoop 0.23/2.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13494902#comment-13494902 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-7143: --- Integrated in HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-2.0.0 #256 (See [https

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7143) TestMetaMigrationRemovingHTD fails when used with Hadoop 0.23/2.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13494901#comment-13494901 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-7143: --- Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #3530 (See [https://builds.apach

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-7056) TestMetaMigrationConvertingToPB failed in HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-2.0.0 two times consecutively

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu resolved HBASE-7056. --- Resolution: Duplicate Duplicate with HBASE-7143 > TestMetaMigrationConvertingToPB failed in

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-7143) TestMetaMigrationRemovingHTD fails when used with Hadoop 0.23/2.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu reassigned HBASE-7143: - Assignee: Andrey Klochkov > TestMetaMigrationRemovingHTD fails when used with Hadoop 0.23/2.x > -

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7143) TestMetaMigrationRemovingHTD fails when used with Hadoop 0.23/2.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-7143: -- Fix Version/s: 0.96.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed > TestMetaMigrationRemovingHTD fails when used with Hadoo

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7143) TestMetaMigrationRemovingHTD fails when used with Hadoop 0.23/2.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13494884#comment-13494884 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-7143: --- Integrated to 0.94 and trunk. Thanks for the patch, Andrey

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6694) Test scanner batching in export job feature HBASE-6372 AND report on improvement HBASE-6372 adds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13494853#comment-13494853 ] Alexander Alten-Lorenz commented on HBASE-6694: --- Ping you guys for ;)

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7142) TestSplitLogManager#testDeadWorker may fail because of hard limit on the TimeoutMonitor's timeout period

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13494846#comment-13494846 ] Himanshu Vashishtha commented on HBASE-7142: Yeah, only 0.94. The timeout in 0

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7103) Need to fail split if SPLIT znode is deleted even before the split is completed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13494845#comment-13494845 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-7103: -- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results o

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7103) Need to fail split if SPLIT znode is deleted even before the split is completed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13494843#comment-13494843 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-7103: --- This patch makes the transi

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7103) Need to fail split if SPLIT znode is deleted even before the split is completed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HBASE-7103: -- Attachment: HBASE-7103_0.94.patch > Need to fail split if SPLIT znode is de

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7143) TestMetaMigrationRemovingHTD fails when used with Hadoop 0.23/2.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13494842#comment-13494842 ] Andrey Klochkov commented on HBASE-7143: the failures reported by Hadoop QA do not

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7143) TestMetaMigrationRemovingHTD fails when used with Hadoop 0.23/2.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13494841#comment-13494841 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-7143: -- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results o