[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10486) ProtobufUtil Append Increment deserialization lost cell level timestamp

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13895464#comment-13895464 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-10486: --- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-3909) Add dynamic config

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13895475#comment-13895475 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-3909: -- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-3909) Add dynamic config

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] binlijin updated HBASE-3909: Attachment: HBASE-3909-backport-from-fb-for-trunk-7.patch Add dynamic config --

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-3909) Add dynamic config

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13895513#comment-13895513 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-3909: -- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-10487) Avoid allocating new KeyValue for appended kvs which don't have existing(old) values

Feng Honghua created HBASE-10487: Summary: Avoid allocating new KeyValue for appended kvs which don't have existing(old) values Key: HBASE-10487 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10487

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-10487) Avoid allocating new KeyValue for appended kvs which don't have existing(old) values

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-10487: - Attachment: HBASE-10487-trunk_v1.patch patch attached Avoid allocating new KeyValue for

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-10487) Avoid allocating new KeyValue and bytes-copying for appended kvs which don't have existing(old) values

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-10487: - Description: in HRegion.append, a new KeyValue will be allocated no matter there is existing kv

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-10487) Avoid allocating new KeyValue and according bytes-copying for appended kvs which don't have existing(old) values

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-10487: - Summary: Avoid allocating new KeyValue and according bytes-copying for appended kvs which don't

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-10487) Avoid allocating new KeyValue and according bytes-copying for appended kvs which don't have existing(old) values

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-10487: - Description: in HRegion.append, new KeyValues will be allocated and do according bytes-copying

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10463) Filter on columns containing numerics yield wrong results

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13895586#comment-13895586 ] Deepa Vasanthkumar commented on HBASE-10463: Thanks [~ndimiduk] The approach

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10485) PrefixFilter#filterKeyValue() should perform filtering on row key

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13895682#comment-13895682 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-10485: --- Looks. All filters need to consistent

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10485) PrefixFilter#filterKeyValue() should perform filtering on row key

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13895686#comment-13895686 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-10485: bq. Looks. Did you mean 'Looks good' ?

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10485) PrefixFilter#filterKeyValue() should perform filtering on row key

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13895692#comment-13895692 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-10485: --- bq. Did you mean 'Looks good' ? Yes :)

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10485) PrefixFilter#filterKeyValue() should perform filtering on row key

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13895695#comment-13895695 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-10485: [~apurtell]: Do you want this in 0.98 ?

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10413) Tablesplit.getLength returns 0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13895729#comment-13895729 ] Lukas Nalezenec commented on HBASE-10413: - Lets make RegionSizeCalculator

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-10413) Tablesplit.getLength returns 0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lukas Nalezenec updated HBASE-10413: Attachment: HBASE-10413-5.patch fix after code review. TableSplit still contains

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10413) Tablesplit.getLength returns 0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13895767#comment-13895767 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-10413: --- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-4064) Two concurrent unassigning of the same region caused the endless loop of Region has been PENDING_CLOSE for too long...

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jonathan Hsieh resolved HBASE-4064. --- Resolution: Won't Fix closing, ancient. Two concurrent unassigning of the same region

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10482) ReplicationSyncUp doesn't clean up its ZK, needed for tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13895792#comment-13895792 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-10482: FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-1.1 #84

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9631) add murmur3 hash

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13895821#comment-13895821 ] Gaurav Menghani commented on HBASE-9631: [~apurtell] I don't think that was an

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-10309) Add support to delete empty regions in 0.94.x series

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl resolved HBASE-10309. --- Resolution: Won't Fix Fix Version/s: (was: 0.94.17) Alright. Lemme close this

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10482) ReplicationSyncUp doesn't clean up its ZK, needed for tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13895837#comment-13895837 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-10482: --- [~jdcryans], want this in 0.94 too? Or are

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-10174) Back port HBASE-9667 'NullOutputStream removed from Guava 15' to 0.94

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl resolved HBASE-10174. --- Resolution: Won't Fix Fix Version/s: (was: 0.94.17) We aren't moving on this.