[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9480) Regions are unexpectedly made offline in certain failure conditions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13768293#comment-13768293 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9480: - bq.(Cc'ing Feng Honghua since he expressed

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9466) Read-only mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13768946#comment-13768946 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9466: - [~stack] / [~jdcryans] : OK, I'll make a

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8751) Enable peer cluster to choose/change the ColumnFamilies/Tables it really want to replicate from a source cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13768963#comment-13768963 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8751: - [~jdcryans] Thanks for the thorough code

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9466) Read-only mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-9466: Assignee: Feng Honghua Read-only mode -- Key: HBASE-9466

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9467) write can be totally blocked temporarily by a write-heavy region

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13769138#comment-13769138 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9467: - [~stack] Thanks for the effort

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8751) Enable peer cluster to choose/change the ColumnFamilies/Tables it really want to replicate from a source cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13769173#comment-13769173 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8751: - [~jdcryans] bq.Normally in the HBase code when

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9467) write can be totally blocked temporarily by a write-heavy region

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13768045#comment-13768045 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9467: - [~nkeywal] bq. I would propose to reuse

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9467) write can be totally blocked temporarily by a write-heavy region

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13768046#comment-13768046 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9467: - [~tlipcon] bq. is this a compatible change?

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9467) write can be totally blocked temporarily by a write-heavy region

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-9467: Attachment: HBASE-9467-trunk-v0.patch patch for trunk write can be totally

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9467) write can be totally blocked temporarily by a write-heavy region

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13766263#comment-13766263 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9467: - Change and explanation of the patch: 1. Throw

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9467) write can be totally blocked temporarily by a write-heavy region

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13764082#comment-13764082 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9467: - I like [~tlipcon]'s idea that we reject write

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9467) write can be totally blocked temporarily by a write-heavy region

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13764133#comment-13764133 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9467: - [~liochon] maybe I used wrong term here, I

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9467) write can be totally blocked temporarily by a write-heavy region

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-9467: Assignee: Feng Honghua write can be totally blocked temporarily by a write-heavy region

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-9500) RpcServer can't be restarted after stop for reuse

Feng Honghua created HBASE-9500: --- Summary: RpcServer can't be restarted after stop for reuse Key: HBASE-9500 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9500 Project: HBase Issue Type:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9467) write can be totally blocked temporarily by a write-heavy region

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13764146#comment-13764146 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9467: - Thanks [~dnicolas] for the reminder, I'll take

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9467) write can be totally blocked temporarily by a write-heavy region

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13764150#comment-13764150 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9467: - correct a typo in above comment: Thanks

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9467) write can be totally blocked temporarily by a write-heavy region

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-9467: Priority: Major (was: Minor) write can be totally blocked temporarily by a write-heavy

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-9501) No throttling for replication

Feng Honghua created HBASE-9501: --- Summary: No throttling for replication Key: HBASE-9501 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9501 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9500) RpcServer can't be restarted after stop for reuse

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-9500: Component/s: IPC/RPC RpcServer can't be restarted after stop for reuse

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9469) Synchronous replication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-9469: Assignee: Feng Honghua Synchronous replication ---

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9469) Synchronous replication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-9469: Priority: Major (was: Minor) Synchronous replication ---

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8751) Enable peer cluster to choose/change the ColumnFamilies/Tables it really want to replicate from a source cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13762885#comment-13762885 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8751: - [~jdcryans] would you please help review this

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9468) Previous active master can still serves RPC request when it is trying recovering expired zk session

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13763937#comment-13763937 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9468: - [~stack] RpcServer can't support turning on

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9468) Previous active master can still serves RPC request when it is trying recovering expired zk session

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-9468: Attachment: HBASE-9468-trunk-v0.patch patch for trunk Previous active master can

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9468) Previous active master can still serves RPC request when it is trying recovering expired zk session

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-9468: Assignee: Feng Honghua Previous active master can still serves RPC request when it is trying

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-9464) master failure during region-move can result in the region moved to a different RS rather than the destination one user specified

Feng Honghua created HBASE-9464: --- Summary: master failure during region-move can result in the region moved to a different RS rather than the destination one user specified Key: HBASE-9464 URL:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-9465) HLog entries are not pushed to peer clusters serially when region-move or RS failure in master cluster

Feng Honghua created HBASE-9465: --- Summary: HLog entries are not pushed to peer clusters serially when region-move or RS failure in master cluster Key: HBASE-9465 URL:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-9466) Read-only mode

Feng Honghua created HBASE-9466: --- Summary: Read-only mode Key: HBASE-9466 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9466 Project: HBase Issue Type: New Feature Reporter:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-9467) write can be totally blocked temporarily by a write-heavy region

Feng Honghua created HBASE-9467: --- Summary: write can be totally blocked temporarily by a write-heavy region Key: HBASE-9467 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9467 Project: HBase

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-9468) Previous active master can still serves RPC request when it is trying recovering expired zk session

Feng Honghua created HBASE-9468: --- Summary: Previous active master can still serves RPC request when it is trying recovering expired zk session Key: HBASE-9468 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9468

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-9469) Synchronous replication

Feng Honghua created HBASE-9469: --- Summary: Synchronous replication Key: HBASE-9469 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9469 Project: HBase Issue Type: New Feature

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9464) master failure during region-move can result in the region moved to a different RS rather than the destination one user specified

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13762642#comment-13762642 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9464: - From the perspective of user who issues the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9465) HLog entries are not pushed to peer clusters serially when region-move or RS failure in master cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13762658#comment-13762658 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9465: - [~jdcryans] I have a draft for a new piece of

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9465) HLog entries are not pushed to peer clusters serially when region-move or RS failure in master cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13762665#comment-13762665 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9465: - [~lhofhansl] For RS failure scenario, can we

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9466) Read-only mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13762675#comment-13762675 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9466: - [~jdcryans] Yes, I'm proposing a 'read-only

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9467) write can be totally blocked temporarily by a write-heavy region

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13762680#comment-13762680 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9467: - [~nkeywal] Can we provide a percentage config

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9468) Previous active master can still serves RPC request when it is trying recovering expired zk session

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13762683#comment-13762683 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9468: - Sounds just fail-fast for the expired master is

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9468) Previous active master can still serves RPC request when it is trying recovering expired zk session

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13762684#comment-13762684 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9468: - [~enis] I agree with you :-). not sure if there

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9469) Synchronous replication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13762686#comment-13762686 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9469: - [~jdcryans] and [~lhofhansl] : Any plan of

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9468) Previous active master can still serves RPC request when it is trying recovering expired zk session

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13762754#comment-13762754 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9468: - [~stack] OK, I'll provide a patch according to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9469) Synchronous replication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13762755#comment-13762755 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9469: - [~lhofhansl] Yes, the better data

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761563#comment-13761563 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8755: - Thanks [~stack]. Looking forward to your test

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13721973#comment-13721973 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8755: - [~jmspaggi], thanks for your test, some

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13718270#comment-13718270 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8755: - [~jmspaggi] HBASE-8755-0.94-V1.patch is good.

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-8755: Attachment: HBASE-8755-trunk-V1.patch updated patch rebased on latest trunk code base

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708473#comment-13708473 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8755: - Thanks a lot [~jmspaggi], looking forward to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708189#comment-13708189 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8755: - [~jmspaggi], what's your result of running YCSB

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8753) Provide new delete flag which can delete all cells under a column-family which have a same designated timestamp

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13701813#comment-13701813 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8753: - [~lhofhansl] Your comment #2 is covered by this

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-8753) Provide new delete flag which can delete all cells under a column-family which have a same designated timestamp

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-8753: Attachment: HBASE-8753-trunk-V3.patch HBASE-8753-0.94-V1.patch Provide new

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8753) Provide new delete flag which can delete all cells under a column-family which have a same designated timestamp

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13702008#comment-13702008 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8753: - Thanks [~yuzhih...@gmail.com] and [~lhofhansl]

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8753) Provide new delete flag which can delete all cells under a column-family which have a same designated timestamp

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13701465#comment-13701465 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8753: - [~lhofhansl]: Your #1/#2 comments are good.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13688936#comment-13688936 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8755: - [~zjushch] We run the same tests as yours, and

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13688957#comment-13688957 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8755: - [~zjushch]: We run the same tests as yours, and

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13688973#comment-13688973 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8755: - Our comparison tests have only the RS bits

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13689094#comment-13689094 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8755: - If possible, would anybody else help do the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8721) Deletes can mask puts that happen after the delete

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13689160#comment-13689160 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8721: - I list some merits with behavior 'Delete can't

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8753) Provide new delete flag which can delete all cells under a column-family which have a same designated timestamp

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13689229#comment-13689229 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8753: - [~lhofhansl] For the backwards-compatibility,

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8721) Deletes can mask puts that happen after the delete

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13689935#comment-13689935 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8721: - [~lhofhansl] Now we're extending this to Puts

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8721) Deletes can mask puts that happen after the delete

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13689938#comment-13689938 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8721: - [~apurtell] / [~lhofhansl]: Maybe I miss

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8721) Deletes can mask puts that happen after the delete

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13689947#comment-13689947 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8721: - [~sershe] btw, HBase does support point

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8753) Provide new delete flag which can delete all cells under a column-family which have a same designated timestamp

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13689953#comment-13689953 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8753: - By design, DeleteFamilyVersion KV's qualifier

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8721) Deletes can mask puts that happen after the delete

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13689975#comment-13689975 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8721: - [~sershe] : It still need 10+ms, at best, for

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8753) Provide new delete flag which can delete all cells under a column-family which have a same designated timestamp

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13687810#comment-13687810 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8753: - [~lhofhansl] It would be better to have it in

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13688739#comment-13688739 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8755: - Thanks Chunhui for this verification test. We

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13688754#comment-13688754 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8755: - [~zjushch] What's the row-size used in your

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13686700#comment-13686700 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8755: - Thanks [~yuzhih...@gmail.com] and [~stack] for

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-8755: Attachment: HBASE-8755-trunk-V0.patch new write thread model patch based on trunk

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-8755: Attachment: HBASE-8755-0.94-V1.patch an update patch based on 0.94 according to Ted/stack's review

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13686711#comment-13686711 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8755: - HBASE-8755-trunk-V0.patch also includes changes

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13686818#comment-13686818 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8755: - [~otis] Yes, QPS really means Writes Per Second

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8721) Deletes can mask puts that happen after the delete

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13686862#comment-13686862 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8721: - Another benefit from behaviour delete can't

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-8753) Provide new delete flag which can delete all cells under a column-family which have a same designated timestamp

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-8753: Attachment: HBASE-8753-trunk-V0.patch [~zjushch]/[~stack] patch for trunk attached, thanks in

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8753) Provide new delete flag which can delete all cells under a column-family which have a same designated timestamp

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13687506#comment-13687506 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8753: - Answer some questions as below: [chunhui]

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8753) Provide new delete flag which can delete all cells under a column-family which have a same designated timestamp

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13685019#comment-13685019 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8753: - Thanks chunhui for the review, I'll make a

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

Feng Honghua created HBASE-8755: --- Summary: A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput Key: HBASE-8755 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755 Project:

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-8755: Attachment: HBASE-8755-0.94-V0.patch the patch HBASE-8755-0.94-V0.patch is based on

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7280) TableNotFoundException thrown in peer cluster will incur endless retry for shipEdits, which in turn block following normal replication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13685495#comment-13685495 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-7280: - [~jeason] You can refer to HBASE-8751 for

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8721) Deletes can mask puts that happen after the delete

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13685655#comment-13685655 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8721: - Thanks guys for your feedback: [~apurtell],

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13685671#comment-13685671 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8755: - Thanks [~yuzhih...@gmail.com] for the detailed

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8721) Deletes can mask puts that happen after the delete

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13685699#comment-13685699 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8721: - [~apurtell] Sorry if I offend. And thanks for

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8753) Provide new delete flag which can delete all cells under a column-family which have a same designated timestamp

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13685702#comment-13685702 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8753: - OK. thanks [~yuzhih...@gmail.com] for the code

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8721) Deletes can mask puts that happen after the delete

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13686302#comment-13686302 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8721: - Another some drawbacks for the config of

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8721) Deletes can mask puts that happen after the delete

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13686327#comment-13686327 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8721: - On the contrary, personally I think allowing

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-8751) Enable peer cluster to choose/change the ColumnFamilies/Tables it really want to replicate from a source cluster

Feng Honghua created HBASE-8751: --- Summary: Enable peer cluster to choose/change the ColumnFamilies/Tables it really want to replicate from a source cluster Key: HBASE-8751 URL:

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-8751) Enable peer cluster to choose/change the ColumnFamilies/Tables it really want to replicate from a source cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-8751: Attachment: HBASE-8751-0.94-V0.patch this patch is based on code from

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-8753) Provide new delete flag which can delete all cells under a column-family which have a same designated timestamp

Feng Honghua created HBASE-8753: --- Summary: Provide new delete flag which can delete all cells under a column-family which have a same designated timestamp Key: HBASE-8753 URL:

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-8753) Provide new delete flag which can delete all cells under a column-family which have a same designated timestamp

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-8753: Attachment: HBASE-8753-0.94-V0.patch patch HBASE-8753-0.94-V0.patch is based on

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8751) Enable peer cluster to choose/change the ColumnFamilies/Tables it really want to replicate from a source cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13684933#comment-13684933 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8751: - Showing up in the 'table:cf-list list' doesn't

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8721) fix for bug that delete can mask puts that happened after the delete was entered

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13681200#comment-13681200 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8721: - [~stack] 1. I also agree keeping deleted cells

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8721) fix for bug that delete can mask puts that happened after the delete was entered

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13681204#comment-13681204 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8721: - [~sershe] This fix is not about timestamp as a

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8721) fix for bug that delete can mask puts that happened after the delete was entered

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13680323#comment-13680323 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8721: - [~sershe] If we want to keep the behaviour

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8721) fix for bug that delete can mask puts that happened after the delete was entered

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13679339#comment-13679339 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8721: - [~andrew.purt...@gmail.com] Consider this

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8721) fix for bug that delete can mask puts that happened after the delete was entered

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13680126#comment-13680126 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8721: - [~sershe]/[~apurtell] The scenario is refined

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-8721) fix for bug that delete can mask puts that happened after the delete was entered

Feng Honghua created HBASE-8721: --- Summary: fix for bug that delete can mask puts that happened after the delete was entered Key: HBASE-8721 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-8721) fix for bug that delete can mask puts that happened after the delete was entered

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Feng Honghua updated HBASE-8721: Attachment: HBASE-8721-0.94-V0.patch fix for bug that delete can mask puts that happened

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8721) fix for bug that delete can mask puts that happened after the delete was entered

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13678994#comment-13678994 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8721: - This fix uses mvcc together with timestamp to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8721) fix for bug that delete can mask puts that happened after the delete was entered

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13678995#comment-13678995 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8721: - this patch is based on code downloaded from

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8357) current region server failover mechanism for replication can lead to stale region server whose left hlogs can't be replicated by other region server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13634718#comment-13634718 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8357: - OK, I'm using hbase 0.94.3 and came up with

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-8357) current region server failover mechanism for replication can lead to stale region server whose left hlogs can't be replicated by other region server

Feng Honghua created HBASE-8357: --- Summary: current region server failover mechanism for replication can lead to stale region server whose left hlogs can't be replicated by other region server Key: HBASE-8357 URL:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7632) fail to create ReplicationSource if ReplicationPeer.startStateTracker checkExists(peerStateNode) and find not exist but fails in createAndWatch due to client/shell is d

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13558511#comment-13558511 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-7632: - attach the call stack: 2013-01-10 09:22:03,084

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >