[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-17503) [C++] Configuration should be settable and used w/o XML files

2017-01-23 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15834162#comment-15834162 ] Heng Chen edited comment on HBASE-17503 at 1/23/17 10:05 AM: - {code} +void

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17503) [C++] Configuration should be settable and used w/o XML files

2017-01-23 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15834162#comment-15834162 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-17503: --- {code} +void Configuration::SetInt(const std::string , const

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17096) checkAndMutateApi doesn't work correctly on 0.98.19+

2016-11-15 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-17096: -- Fix Version/s: 0.98.24 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > checkAndMutateApi doesn't

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17096) checkAndMutateApi doesn't work correctly on 0.98.19+

2016-11-15 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-17096: -- Attachment: HBASE-17096-0.98.v2.patch Really sorry for this issue, i miss the condition in request of

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17096) checkAndMutateApi doesn't work correctly on 0.98.19+

2016-11-15 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15667090#comment-15667090 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-17096: --- Let me check it. :) > checkAndMutateApi doesn't work correctly

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17092) Both LoadIncrementalHFiles#doBulkLoad() methods should set return value

2016-11-14 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15665637#comment-15665637 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-17092: --- +1 > Both LoadIncrementalHFiles#doBulkLoad() methods should set

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17037) Enhance LoadIncrementalHFiles API to convey loaded files

2016-11-12 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15659254#comment-15659254 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-17037: --- +1 for it. > Enhance LoadIncrementalHFiles API to convey loaded

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16938) TableCFsUpdater maybe failed due to no write permission on peerNode

2016-10-31 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15624262#comment-15624262 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16938: --- The patch looks OK to me. It extracts the updater to be one tool,

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16938) TableCFsUpdater maybe failed due to no write permission on peerNode

2016-10-31 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15624032#comment-15624032 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16938: --- It is OK for me to make the Updater to be one tool. >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16973) Revisiting default value for hbase.client.scanner.caching

2016-10-31 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15622248#comment-15622248 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16973: --- Notice that HBase-11544 has been only applied on branch-1.1.x, So

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16954) Unify HTable#checkAndDelete with AP

2016-10-30 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15620914#comment-15620914 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16954: --- commit to master > Unify HTable#checkAndDelete with AP >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16954) Unify HTable#checkAndDelete with AP

2016-10-30 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15620917#comment-15620917 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16954: --- Thanks [~chia7712] for your patch. > Unify HTable#checkAndDelete

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16954) Unify HTable#checkAndDelete with AP

2016-10-30 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16954: -- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16954) Unify HTable#checkAndDelete with AP

2016-10-27 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15613849#comment-15613849 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16954: --- +1 > Unify HTable#checkAndDelete with AP >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16610) Unify append, increment with AP

2016-10-27 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15612286#comment-15612286 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16610: --- Thanks [~chia7712] for your attention. I am little busy recently,

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16593) Unify HTable with AP

2016-10-27 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15612277#comment-15612277 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16593: --- Of course we could do it. Go for it. [~chia7712] :) > Unify

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16698) Performance issue: handlers stuck waiting for CountDownLatch inside WALKey#getWriteEntry under high writing workload

2016-10-16 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15581074#comment-15581074 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16698: --- patch for branch-1 LGTM. +1 We will open it by default on

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16698) Performance issue: handlers stuck waiting for CountDownLatch inside WALKey#getWriteEntry under high writing workload

2016-10-16 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15581067#comment-15581067 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16698: --- {quote} so in my analysis, waiting for sync and waiting for latch

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16853) Regions are assigned to Region Servers in /hbase/draining after HBase Master failover

2016-10-16 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15580931#comment-15580931 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16853: --- +1 > Regions are assigned to Region Servers in /hbase/draining

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16653) Backport HBASE-11393 to all branches which support namespace

2016-10-14 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15574695#comment-15574695 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16653: --- NO. Not do it. And old rs can't parse NS information due to it

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16821) Enhance LoadIncrementalHFiles to convey missing hfiles if any

2016-10-14 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15574683#comment-15574683 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16821: --- Any differenece between v1 and v2? > Enhance

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16785) We are not running all tests

2016-10-14 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15574538#comment-15574538 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16785: --- It worked! Cheering! +1 for patch > We are not running all

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16653) Backport HBASE-11393 to all branches which support namespace

2016-10-14 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15574527#comment-15574527 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16653: --- Old RS can't parse peer information with namespace. > Backport

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-16698) Performance issue: handlers stuck waiting for CountDownLatch inside WALKey#getWriteEntry under high writing workload

2016-10-14 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15574517#comment-15574517 ] Heng Chen edited comment on HBASE-16698 at 10/14/16 7:24 AM: - I think

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16698) Performance issue: handlers stuck waiting for CountDownLatch inside WALKey#getWriteEntry under high writing workload

2016-10-14 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15574517#comment-15574517 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16698: --- I think [~allan163] you are right. It is different between

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16821) Enhance LoadIncrementalHFiles to convey missing hfiles if any

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15574105#comment-15574105 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16821: --- +1 for it. LGTM. > Enhance LoadIncrementalHFiles to convey

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16664: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.8) (was: 1.2.5) > Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15574102#comment-15574102 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- I see it. If so, i suggest we just leave operationTimeout

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15574072#comment-15574072 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- I think we should add the setXXTimeout interface in Table for

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15574052#comment-15574052 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- branch-1.1 and branch-1.2 patch seems not fix "setXXXTimeout not

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16664: -- Fix Version/s: 1.1.8 1.2.5 > Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15574033#comment-15574033 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- OH, sorry, miss the two patch, let me commit them. > Timeout

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16832) Reduce the default number of versions in Meta table for branch-1

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15573956#comment-15573956 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16832: --- Thanks [~aoxiang]. +1 for it. > Reduce the default number of

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16832) Reduce the default number of versions in Meta table for branch-1

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15573922#comment-15573922 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16832: --- [~te...@apache.org] do you know why DEFAULT_HBASE_META_VERSIONS is

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16653) Backport HBASE-11393 to all branches which support namespace

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15573914#comment-15573914 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16653: --- Due to we modify proto object of ReplicationPeerConfig (add

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16832) Reduce the default number of versions in Meta table for branch-1

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15573810#comment-15573810 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16832: --- The default value of major_compaction for your cluster is 7 days?

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16807) RegionServer will fail to report new active Hmaster until HMaster/RegionServer failover

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15572129#comment-15572129 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16807: --- commit to all branches > RegionServer will fail to report new

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16807) RegionServer will fail to report new active Hmaster until HMaster/RegionServer failover

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16807: -- Fix Version/s: 1.1.8 1.2.5 > RegionServer will fail to report new active Hmaster

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16807) RegionServer will fail to report new active Hmaster until HMaster/RegionServer failover

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16807: -- Fix Version/s: 0.98.24 1.3.1 1.4.0 > RegionServer will fail to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16807) RegionServer will fail to report new active Hmaster until HMaster/RegionServer failover

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15572030#comment-15572030 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16807: --- Will you upload patch for branch-1.1 and branch-1.2 ? >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16807) RegionServer will fail to report new active Hmaster until HMaster/RegionServer failover

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15572025#comment-15572025 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16807: --- That's great you have patch for branch-1+, let me commit it. >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16664: -- Release Note: This issue fix three bugs: 1. rpcTimeout configuration not work for one rpc call in AP

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16664: -- Release Note: This issue fix three bugs: 1. rpcTimeout configuration not work for one rpc call in AP

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16664: -- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Release Note: This issue fix three bugs: 1.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15571706#comment-15571706 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- push to branch-1.3 > Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16807) RegionServer will fail to report new active Hmaster until HMaster/RegionServer failover

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15571528#comment-15571528 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16807: --- push to master. Thanks all the guys! > RegionServer will fail to

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16807) RegionServer will fail to report new active Hmaster until HMaster/RegionServer failover

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16807: -- Resolution: Fixed Release Note: push to master. Thanks all the guys! Status: Resolved

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16664: -- Attachment: HBASE-16664-branch-1.3.v3.patch > Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15571399#comment-15571399 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- Failed testcase of patch v2 on branch-1 is not related. Most of

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16664: -- Attachment: HBASE-16664-branch-1.v3.patch upload patch v3 for branch-1, remove unused tracker.start

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-13 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16664: -- Fix Version/s: 1.3.1 1.4.0 2.0.0 > Timeout logic in AsyncProcess

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16807) RegionServer will fail to report new active Hmaster until HMaster/RegionServer failover

2016-10-12 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15570846#comment-15570846 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16807: --- Got it. +1 for it. > RegionServer will fail to report new active

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16698) Performance issue: handlers stuck waiting for CountDownLatch inside WALKey#getWriteEntry under high writing workload

2016-10-12 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15570840#comment-15570840 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16698: --- Numbers seems 20 regions on one RS. If you have time, please

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16807) RegionServer will fail to report new active Hmaster until HMaster/RegionServer failover

2016-10-12 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15570829#comment-15570829 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16807: --- You patch seems just skip the cache without consider

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16653) Backport HBASE-11393 to all branches which support namespace

2016-10-12 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15570822#comment-15570822 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16653: --- Let me take a look of patch v3. Need some time. > Backport

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-12 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15570746#comment-15570746 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- Failed test cases for v7 seems not related. If you are not hurry,

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-12 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15567915#comment-15567915 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- remove the line in MultiServerCallable.call in branch-1 patch

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-12 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15567826#comment-15567826 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- As for operationTimeout meaning, yeah, the operation should from

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-12 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15567778#comment-15567778 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- it should be better for tracker.start() moved into

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-11 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15567711#comment-15567711 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- OK. If all your guys agree with operation timeout should be

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16807) RegionServer will fail to report new active Hmaster until HMaster/RegionServer failover

2016-10-11 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15567648#comment-15567648 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16807: --- Just skip the cache is OK here? > RegionServer will fail to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-11 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15567527#comment-15567527 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- {quote} Then just set operation timeout to Long.MAX_VALUE and use

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-11 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15567465#comment-15567465 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- {quote} We can not tell users "some operations don't support a

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-11 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15567451#comment-15567451 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- {quote} And I think for a user, I call the batch method, or the

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-11 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15567420#comment-15567420 ] Heng Chen edited comment on HBASE-16664 at 10/12/16 3:34 AM: - The typical

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-11 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15567420#comment-15567420 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- The typical case in our application is something like

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-11 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15567379#comment-15567379 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- Normally we share one HTable object in our application. It is

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-11 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15567343#comment-15567343 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- For example, in our production cluster, we set operation timeout

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-10-11 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15567319#comment-15567319 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- I think the reason we did not set total timeout for batch is that

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16653) Backport HBASE-11393 to all branches which support namespace

2016-09-29 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15534842#comment-15534842 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16653: --- As [~enis] mentioned, we should leave the deprecated method here

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-09-28 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15529035#comment-15529035 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- Yes, the timeout logic has conflicts. After HBASE-16607,

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-09-28 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15528946#comment-15528946 ] Heng Chen edited comment on HBASE-16664 at 9/28/16 8:49 AM: So we could

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-09-28 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15528946#comment-15528946 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- So we could modify the operation timeout judgement logic in

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-09-28 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15528761#comment-15528761 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- {quote} As I said, we can not use RetryingTimeTracker because it

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-09-28 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16664: -- Attachment: 1.patch 1.patch (Maybe compile failed, very rough patch) could describe my thought

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-09-28 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15528636#comment-15528636 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- {quote} one is we use remaining time as the rpc timeout in

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-09-28 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15528595#comment-15528595 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- Just skim the patch, not see the big difference with the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16698) Performance issue: handlers stuck waiting for CountDownLatch inside WALKey#getWriteEntry under high writing workload

2016-09-28 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15528581#comment-15528581 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16698: --- {quote} so the main problem is sequential appends and the logic

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16698) Performance issue: handlers stuck waiting for CountDownLatch inside WALKey#getWriteEntry under high writing workload

2016-09-26 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15524987#comment-15524987 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16698: --- How much the performance will be downgrade when ops are just for

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16665) Check whether KeyValueUtil.createXXX could be replaced by CellUtil without copy

2016-09-25 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16665: -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Heng Chen Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-09-25 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15520300#comment-15520300 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- Not sure what is your patch want to do. But if you want the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16664) Timeout logic in AsyncProcess is broken

2016-09-25 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15520289#comment-15520289 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16664: --- {quote} The tracker must be started from beginning, not each call.

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16677) Add table size (total store file size) to table page

2016-09-24 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16677: -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Guang Yang Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16677) Add table size (total store file size) to table page

2016-09-24 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15520064#comment-15520064 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16677: --- works locally. Push to master and branch-1 > Add table size

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16665) Check whether KeyValueUtil.createXXX could be replaced by CellUtil without copy

2016-09-24 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15519903#comment-15519903 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16665: --- will commit it if no other concerns. > Check whether

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16665) Check whether KeyValueUtil.createXXX could be replaced by CellUtil without copy

2016-09-23 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15518113#comment-15518113 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16665: --- hadoop.hbase.client.TestBlockEvictionFromClient failed w/ or w/o

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16677) Add table size (total store file size) to table page

2016-09-23 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16677: -- Fix Version/s: 1.2.4 1.1.7 1.3.1 1.4.0

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16677) Add table size (total store file size) to table page

2016-09-23 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15518100#comment-15518100 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16677: --- LGTM. +1 Let me test it locally and commit it. Thanks

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16702) TestBlockEvictionFromClient is broken

2016-09-23 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16702: -- Description:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-16702) TestBlockEvictionFromClient is broken

2016-09-23 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
Heng Chen created HBASE-16702: - Summary: TestBlockEvictionFromClient is broken Key: HBASE-16702 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16702 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16665) Check whether KeyValueUtil.createXXX could be replaced by CellUtil without copy

2016-09-23 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16665: -- Attachment: HBASE-16665.v3.patch > Check whether KeyValueUtil.createXXX could be replaced by CellUtil

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16665) Check whether KeyValueUtil.createXXX could be replaced by CellUtil without copy

2016-09-23 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15516028#comment-15516028 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16665: --- Sounds reasonable. Empty byte[] will be better. > Check whether

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16665) Check whether KeyValueUtil.createXXX could be replaced by CellUtil without copy

2016-09-23 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15516005#comment-15516005 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16665: --- v2 Fix failed testcase > Check whether KeyValueUtil.createXXX

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16665) Check whether KeyValueUtil.createXXX could be replaced by CellUtil without copy

2016-09-23 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heng Chen updated HBASE-16665: -- Attachment: HBASE-16665.v2.patch > Check whether KeyValueUtil.createXXX could be replaced by CellUtil

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16677) Add table size (total store file size) to table page

2016-09-22 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15515236#comment-15515236 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16677: --- +1 for patch v3, Not see regions hidden in your upload pic?

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16677) Add table size (total store file size) to table page

2016-09-22 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15512545#comment-15512545 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16677: --- That is a good point. We have the same pain on production cluster

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16665) Check whether KeyValueUtil.createXXX could be replaced by CellUtil without copy

2016-09-22 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15512417#comment-15512417 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16665: --- Will open another issue for cleanup, keep this issue small and

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-16665) Check whether KeyValueUtil.createXXX could be replaced by CellUtil without copy

2016-09-22 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15512330#comment-15512330 ] Heng Chen edited comment on HBASE-16665 at 9/22/16 6:22 AM: Another thoughts

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16665) Check whether KeyValueUtil.createXXX could be replaced by CellUtil without copy

2016-09-22 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15512330#comment-15512330 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16665: --- Another thoughts about KeyValueUtil and CellUtil, we'd better to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16670) Make RpcServer#processRequest logic more robust

2016-09-22 Thread Heng Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15512318#comment-15512318 ] Heng Chen commented on HBASE-16670: --- sounds reasonable. Will be more friendly to our users. +1 >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >