Apache9 commented on PR #4716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4716#issuecomment-1284839971
Any progress here? @ndimiduk
With HBASE-25983, we are ready to move the release process to jdk11. And for
HBASE-27359, we also need to change the release scripts to generate differen
Apache9 commented on PR #4716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4716#issuecomment-1285376347
> I've not attempted release candidates anytime recently, so the status here
is not changed. There's a couple reviewer questions about the wisdom of
exposing the socket with elevated privil
Apache9 commented on PR #4716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4716#issuecomment-1307309050
What do you mean by 'standard socket'?
I'm not an expert here, for me, I always need to change the extra-socket to
socket when using the scripts locally on an ubuntu 22.04 machine...
--
Apache9 commented on PR #4716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4716#issuecomment-1307333124
> Yes, this is my point -- since we upgraded to this combination of gpg and
maven-gpg-plugin, builds require use of the extra socket. This is why I think
that we should merge this patch as
Apache9 commented on PR #4716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4716#issuecomment-1307367720
Ah, OK, no problem.
+1.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific c
Apache9 commented on PR #4716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4716#issuecomment-1223497218
I also changed the script locally to use `agent-socket` instead of
`agent-extra-socket` but probably this is just a different usage.
I own the build machine so I can put the private k
Apache9 commented on PR #4716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4716#issuecomment-1225129303
> > I also changed the script locally to use `agent-socket` instead of
`agent-extra-socket` but probably this is just a different usage.
> > I own the build machine so I can put the priva
