wchevreuil commented on pull request #1883:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/1883#issuecomment-657418801
We had decided to go with approach from HBASE-24664.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
wchevreuil commented on pull request #1883:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/1883#issuecomment-651722529
> @wchevreuil
> Thought it again, if this new splitPolicy is useable in branch-2.2 and
branch-2.3, but disappear in branch-2.4 without deprecated cycle, is it break
the
wchevreuil commented on pull request #1883:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/1883#issuecomment-650299753
@bsglz , sorry for the delay. So majority of people on the DISCUSS thread
opined towards #3. I think @busbey suggestion to fix
IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy for
wchevreuil commented on pull request #1883:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/1883#issuecomment-648309919
> IMO if we change split policy to consider region's total size rather than
HStore size, we should also correct the config name. We can follow deprecation
cycle for the
wchevreuil commented on pull request #1883:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/1883#issuecomment-648078417
@bsglz , sorry for the delay. Let's give one more day for the DISCUSS
thread.
This is an automated message
wchevreuil commented on pull request #1883:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/1883#issuecomment-646565902
I have raised a discussion here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r08a8103e2532eb667a0fcb4efa8a4117b3f82e6251bc4bd0bc157c26%40%3Cdev.hbase.apache.org%3E
Let's wait
