[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14102325#comment-14102325
]
Nicolas Liochon commented on HBASE-11334:
-
Would it make sense to use directly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14102457#comment-14102457
]
stack commented on HBASE-11334:
---
bq. Next step would be to abstract them so that the hadoop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14102468#comment-14102468
]
stack commented on HBASE-11334:
---
bq. Why do we need to move to another [~jayunit100]?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14102473#comment-14102473
]
stack commented on HBASE-11334:
---
[~jayunit100] What you suggest for reconciling logging
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14028580#comment-14028580
]
jay vyas commented on HBASE-11334:
--
Linked to HBASE-10092. This JIRA could take
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14028796#comment-14028796
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-11334:
Well we want to use log4j2's async back
