[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16684) The get() requests does not see locally buffered put() requests when autoflush is disabled

2016-09-25 Thread ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15522066#comment-15522066 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-16684: I see. So even if autoflush is disabled

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16684) The get() requests does not see locally buffered put() requests when autoflush is disabled

2016-09-25 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15521881#comment-15521881 ] stack commented on HBASE-16684: --- Yeah. What [~allan163] said. This is a duplicate of hbase-15811? > The

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16684) The get() requests does not see locally buffered put() requests when autoflush is disabled

2016-09-25 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15521779#comment-15521779 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-16684: This problem should have been fixed in HBASE-15811 > The get()

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16684) The get() requests does not see locally buffered put() requests when autoflush is disabled

2016-09-23 Thread Anoop Sam John (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15515743#comment-15515743 ] Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-16684: Ya some thing can be considered as committed only after

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16684) The get() requests does not see locally buffered put() requests when autoflush is disabled

2016-09-22 Thread ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15515361#comment-15515361 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-16684: Is this a bug or is it a valid case? So