[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17959) Canary timeout should be configurable on a per-table basis

2018-04-05 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16427323#comment-16427323 ] stack commented on HBASE-17959: --- Nit: Committed with slightly wonky JIRA ID commit db8ce05

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17959) Canary timeout should be configurable on a per-table basis

2017-05-31 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16032280#comment-16032280 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-17959: --- | (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ ||

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17959) Canary timeout should be configurable on a per-table basis

2017-05-31 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16031503#comment-16031503 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-17959: [~ckulkarni] Interested in providing a p

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17959) Canary timeout should be configurable on a per-table basis

2017-05-31 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16031501#comment-16031501 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-17959: Looks good, committing > Canary timeout

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17959) Canary timeout should be configurable on a per-table basis

2017-05-30 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16030097#comment-16030097 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-17959: --- | (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ ||

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17959) Canary timeout should be configurable on a per-table basis

2017-05-30 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16029835#comment-16029835 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-17959: lgtm, let's have yetus look at it. Setti

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17959) Canary timeout should be configurable on a per-table basis

2017-05-19 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16018066#comment-16018066 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-17959: {code} + LOG.info("Read/Wri

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17959) Canary timeout should be configurable on a per-table basis

2017-05-17 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16014968#comment-16014968 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-17959: No strong opinion, thanks [~ckulkarni].

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17959) Canary timeout should be configurable on a per-table basis

2017-05-17 Thread Chinmay Kulkarni (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16014961#comment-16014961 ] Chinmay Kulkarni commented on HBASE-17959: -- [~apurtell] Thanks for your comments

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17959) Canary timeout should be configurable on a per-table basis

2017-05-16 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16013039#comment-16013039 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-17959: Or just use a ConcurrentHashMap? Still n