[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21085) Adding getter methods to some private fields in ProcedureV2 module

2018-08-22 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16588989#comment-16588989 ] stack commented on HBASE-21085: --- Ok [~allan163]. Lets see. Last night I was frustrated by how locked down

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21085) Adding getter methods to some private fields in ProcedureV2 module

2018-08-22 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16588826#comment-16588826 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-21085: [~stack], I need to make amv2 more transparent when debugging.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21085) Adding getter methods to some private fields in ProcedureV2 module

2018-08-21 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16587867#comment-16587867 ] stack commented on HBASE-21085: --- >From the get-go, Procedure and related classes, have worked hard to keep

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21085) Adding getter methods to some private fields in ProcedureV2 module

2018-08-21 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16587590#comment-16587590 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-21085: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21085) Adding getter methods to some private fields in ProcedureV2 module

2018-08-21 Thread Duo Zhang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16587431#comment-16587431 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-21085: --- Why? For me, at least for SchemaLocking, it is intentional to