[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20542) Better heap utilization for IMC with MSLABs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16683492#comment-16683492 ] Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20542: --- bq. if cellSize larger than inmemoryFlushSize,

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20542) Better heap utilization for IMC with MSLABs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16683776#comment-16683776 ] Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20542: --- It can work. But are you sure MOB should be treated with

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20542) Better heap utilization for IMC with MSLABs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-20542: -- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Better heap utilization

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15560) TinyLFU-based BlockCache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16820448#comment-16820448 ] Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-15560: --- Congratulations!! Great to see this finally get in :) >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22324) loss a mass of data when the sequenceId of cells greater than Integer.Max, because MemStoreMergerSegmentsIterator can not merge segments

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16831425#comment-16831425 ] Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-22324: --- Thanks [~HB-CY]. Note that

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22324) loss a mass of data when the sequenceId of cells greater than Integer.Max, because MemStoreMergerSegmentsIterator can not merge segments

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16833704#comment-16833704 ] Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-22324: --- nice work. nitpicking: the two test methods are not 100%

<    3   4   5   6   7   8