[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6160:
-
Attachment: HBASE-6160_v2.patch
What I applied to trunk (has Ted's suggested fixes)
META
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6160:
-
Attachment: HBASE-6160v2092.txt
Here is patch I applied to 0.92 and 0.94 branches.
META
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6160:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.94.1
0.92.2
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5609:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.96.0)
0.94.1
Applied to 0.94 too at Lars' request.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5609:
-
Attachment: HBASE-5609-v4-094.txt
What I applied to 0.94.
Add the ability to pass additional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13289615#comment-13289615
]
stack commented on HBASE-6160:
--
bq. In some cases that we saw the region kept on growing.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13289623#comment-13289623
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
Why move this out of getRegionPlan? Don't we want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13289625#comment-13289625
]
stack commented on HBASE-6040:
--
Make a new one at this stage I'd suggest Anoop; this one has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-3537:
-
Attachment: disqus.txt
This seems to work (disqus that is). Let me push it out. If anyone wants to
be a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack resolved HBASE-3537.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.96.0
Assignee: stack
Ok. Deployed. Lets see how this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13289729#comment-13289729
]
stack commented on HBASE-6162:
--
That would make some sense Lars.
Move
stack created HBASE-6167:
Summary: Fix xinclude for docs broke when we multi-moduled
Key: HBASE-6167
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6167
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack resolved HBASE-6167.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.96.0
Assignee: stack
Committed to trunk.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6167:
-
Attachment: xinclude.txt
Small fix.
Fix xinclude for docs broke when we multi-moduled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13289853#comment-13289853
]
stack commented on HBASE-3537:
--
I got the fb comment box up. It has the 'post to fb'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13289936#comment-13289936
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
@Chunhui That is inventive. It has merit in that we only do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13289941#comment-13289941
]
stack commented on HBASE-6053:
--
bq. But one could provide alternate implementations of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13289946#comment-13289946
]
stack commented on HBASE-6135:
--
Fancypants!
Style the Web UI to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13289949#comment-13289949
]
stack commented on HBASE-6168:
--
Excellent.
Stuff like this is really great ...Side note: If
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13289971#comment-13289971
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
@Ram I looked at Chunhui's suggestion and read it as a fix in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13289975#comment-13289975
]
stack commented on HBASE-6038:
--
Patch looks good Gregory. Is there some of hbase-6000 in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13289979#comment-13289979
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
On znode check, yes, the rs is doing the checks before it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6038:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Committed to
stack created HBASE-6174:
Summary: TestPBOnWritableRpc failing with -Dhadoop.profile=2.0
Key: HBASE-6174
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6174
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack resolved HBASE-6174.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Hmm... now it passes for me too. Sorry for the distraction. Resolving invalid.
stack created HBASE-6176:
Summary: Take down the stargate reset doc or add pointer to manual
documentation
Key: HBASE-6176
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6176
Project: HBase
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13290443#comment-13290443
]
stack commented on HBASE-5924:
--
@nkeywal Did you add the history in the first place? Why is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13290453#comment-13290453
]
stack commented on HBASE-6176:
--
What is your wikiname (its been locked down because it was a
stack created HBASE-6179:
Summary: Fix stylesheet broke since multimodule and address
feedback gotten in new comment system
Key: HBASE-6179
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6179
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6179:
-
Attachment: 6179.txt
Patch applied to trunk... reference stylesheet properly for multimodule context
and fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack resolved HBASE-6179.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.96.0
Assignee: stack
Applied to trunk.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6177:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.96.0
Assignee: Elliott Clark
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13290490#comment-13290490
]
stack commented on HBASE-6135:
--
The metrics should go on a page of their own? Or, I suppose
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13290497#comment-13290497
]
stack commented on HBASE-6135:
--
I took a look see... its nicer than what we have. Have we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13290499#comment-13290499
]
stack commented on HBASE-6135:
--
oh, how about a logo?
Style the Web UI to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13290510#comment-13290510
]
stack commented on HBASE-6175:
--
This is the question you asked on the list Nicolas (why
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13290531#comment-13290531
]
stack commented on HBASE-6162:
--
Ok. Lets leave comparators as they are for now. Can break
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13290556#comment-13290556
]
stack commented on HBASE-6162:
--
When hbase-server compiles its tests, it does not include
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13290559#comment-13290559
]
stack commented on HBASE-6176:
--
Try now Andrew.
Take down the stargate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack resolved HBASE-6168.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Applied to trunk. Thanks for the patch Chris.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6181:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.94.1
0.92.2
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13290800#comment-13290800
]
stack commented on HBASE-6183:
--
This is interesting Jimmy. I took a quick look around and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13290805#comment-13290805
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
Yes. Been trying to get to it all day but looks like it'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13290821#comment-13290821
]
stack commented on HBASE-6162:
--
Yeah, lets undo these dependencies. TestConst we agreed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13291053#comment-13291053
]
stack commented on HBASE-6162:
--
@Matt Makes sense. I'd have seen that if I looked closer.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13291069#comment-13291069
]
stack commented on HBASE-5924:
--
Upload v10 nkeywal and we'll commit it. Thanks for responses
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13291283#comment-13291283
]
stack commented on HBASE-6183:
--
Can you just do -DcompileSource=1.7 when you invoke mvn?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13291416#comment-13291416
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
I think I understand this patch now.
In AM, we introduce a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13291418#comment-13291418
]
stack commented on HBASE-5726:
--
+1 Lets try it Ted.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13291420#comment-13291420
]
stack commented on HBASE-6173:
--
@Jimmy You have a +1 from Jon. Go commit?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13291426#comment-13291426
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
My other high level comment is:
3. This patch will not fix a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13291551#comment-13291551
]
stack commented on HBASE-6191:
--
@Otis Can you help here? Can we have a book checkbox in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6060:
-
Attachment: 6060_suggestion_based_off_v3.patch
Suggestion.
Regions's in OPENING state from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13291568#comment-13291568
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
@Enis Yeah, its a big problem.
Ram and Rajeshbabu, I just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13291575#comment-13291575
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
bq. We are only maintaining regions and the RITS. not the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6060:
-
Attachment: 6060_suggestion2_based_off_v3.patch
v2 is more basic still.
It undoes the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13291835#comment-13291835
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
bq. Excluding this server we will call one more assign
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13292114#comment-13292114
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
Just some notes after looking more at this stuff.
We have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6060:
-
Attachment: 6060_alternative_suggestion.txt
What about this Ram? Its about four lines. I haven't tried it yet.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13292429#comment-13292429
]
stack commented on HBASE-6194:
--
+1 good idea. Could even do it w/ color scheme regions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13292470#comment-13292470
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
bq. We need to consider regions in OPEN state also(along with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13292475#comment-13292475
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
bq. But the gain with bulk assignment is its faster which we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13292476#comment-13292476
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
@rajeshbabu So, you are allowing the single-assign to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13292589#comment-13292589
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
Rajesh says:
bq. Lets suppose Region server went down after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13292835#comment-13292835
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
What do I have to change in that section of code? It seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13292884#comment-13292884
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
bq. Or else if the region has been moved to OPENING and the
stack created HBASE-6198:
Summary: Sometimes we synchronize on RegionState instance updating
it, most of the time we don't. Fix
Key: HBASE-6198
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6198
Project:
stack created HBASE-6199:
Summary: Change PENDING_OPEN scope from pre-rpc open to OPENING to
just post-rpc open to OPENING
Key: HBASE-6199
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6199
Project: HBase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6199:
-
Attachment: pending_open.txt
Lets see how this patch does.
Change PENDING_OPEN scope from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6199:
-
Attachment: pending_open2.txt
First patch had mistake in it.
Change PENDING_OPEN scope from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6199:
-
Assignee: stack
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Change PENDING_OPEN scope from pre-rpc open to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6199:
-
Attachment: pending_open3.txt
Fix comments.
Change PENDING_OPEN scope from pre-rpc open to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6199:
-
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
Change PENDING_OPEN scope from pre-rpc open to OPENING to just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6199:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Change PENDING_OPEN scope from pre-rpc open to OPENING to just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6199:
-
Attachment: 6199v4.txt
Cleaner version (the v3 didn't apply to fresh trunk)
Change
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293390#comment-13293390
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
bq. Now after calling openregion if the OpenRegionHandler is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293706#comment-13293706
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
@Ram So, the rpc returns successfully. The very next step is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293973#comment-13293973
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
@Ram Thinking on it, the way to plug the hole you and Rajesh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13294150#comment-13294150
]
stack commented on HBASE-6185:
--
@nneverwei Thanks for doing this. Should the patch also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13295198#comment-13295198
]
stack commented on HBASE-6205:
--
@Chunhui Why a special hbase trash dir? Why not just use the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13295204#comment-13295204
]
stack commented on HBASE-5924:
--
I took a look at committed patch. This looks great.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13295241#comment-13295241
]
stack commented on HBASE-6195:
--
Xing Nice work. When you run MultiThreadsIncrement w/ your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6162:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Committed to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13295259#comment-13295259
]
stack commented on HBASE-6192:
--
@Laxman I'll take care of convertion to our doc format. Just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13295267#comment-13295267
]
stack commented on HBASE-3909:
--
bq. My understanding is that all configuration properties
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13295271#comment-13295271
]
stack commented on HBASE-5998:
--
I took a look at backporting at Anoop's request. Its not a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13295272#comment-13295272
]
stack commented on HBASE-6202:
--
Changes seem reasonable Jimmy. Why you think they are needed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13295276#comment-13295276
]
stack commented on HBASE-4391:
--
@Matteo What about Andrew's suggested location for the src
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6197:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.96.0
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Ted committed
stack created HBASE-6210:
Summary: Backport HBASE-6197 to 0.94 and 0.92?
Key: HBASE-6210
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6210
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13295297#comment-13295297
]
stack commented on HBASE-6197:
--
I made HBASE-6210 for backport.
HRegion's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6185:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Committed to trunk and 0.94
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13295311#comment-13295311
]
stack commented on HBASE-6060:
--
bq. But i agree two systems AM and SSH take decision based on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13295323#comment-13295323
]
stack commented on HBASE-6135:
--
Ok if I commit this? Can fine tune in other issues?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6135:
-
Attachment: HBASE-6135-2.patch
Elliott's patch only w/ the logo in src/resources dir so can be found when run
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-6135:
-
Attachment: HBASE-6135-5.patch
What I committed.
Style the Web UI to use Twitter's Bootstrap.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack resolved HBASE-6135.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Thanks for the patch Elliott. Nice.
Style
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13295345#comment-13295345
]
stack commented on HBASE-5564:
--
+1 on commit.
Bulkload is discarding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13295348#comment-13295348
]
stack commented on HBASE-6196:
--
Want to update the JIRA subject then Ram to reflect the new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13295354#comment-13295354
]
stack commented on HBASE-6201:
--
Thanks for doing this Enis. +1 on making subjiras off this
701 - 800 of 38916 matches
Mail list logo