[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6195) Increment data will be lost when the memstore is flushed

2012-06-14 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6195: - Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Ted committed this a few days ago.

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6210) Backport HBASE-6197 to 0.94 and 0.92?

2012-06-14 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6210: - Priority: Blocker (was: Major) Fix Version/s: 0.94.1 Making blocker so it gets consideration

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-6218) Add dynamic on/off tracing facility to regionserver; lightweight(?) record of read/write load

2012-06-15 Thread stack (JIRA)
stack created HBASE-6218: Summary: Add dynamic on/off tracing facility to regionserver; lightweight(?) record of read/write load Key: HBASE-6218 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6218 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6211) Latencies not in jmx

2012-06-15 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13296094#comment-13296094 ] stack commented on HBASE-6211: -- +1 on patch. Elliott, can you prove they show up in jmx?

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-6222) Add per-KeyValue Security, get federal funding for HBase?

2012-06-15 Thread stack (JIRA)
stack created HBASE-6222: Summary: Add per-KeyValue Security, get federal funding for HBase? Key: HBASE-6222 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6222 Project: HBase Issue Type: New

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6222) Add per-KeyValue Security

2012-06-16 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13393450#comment-13393450 ] stack commented on HBASE-6222: -- @Lars When you say ...I thought it might be good to have the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5923) Cleanup checkAndXXX logic

2012-06-16 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5923?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13393451#comment-13393451 ] stack commented on HBASE-5923: -- bq ...but that would change the wire protocol Thats fine in

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5923) Cleanup checkAndXXX logic

2012-06-16 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5923?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13393452#comment-13393452 ] stack commented on HBASE-5923: -- And, please don't close it as won't fix... This is really

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-6214) Backport HBASE-5998 to 94.1

2012-06-16 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack resolved HBASE-6214. -- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed I committed the patch that was over on hbase-5998. Looks good

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5998) Bulk assignment: regionserver optimization by using a temporary cache for table descriptors when receveing an open regions request

2012-06-16 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13393455#comment-13393455 ] stack commented on HBASE-5998: -- I committed the 0.94 backport over in hbase-6214.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6222) Add per-KeyValue Security

2012-06-17 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13393623#comment-13393623 ] stack commented on HBASE-6222: -- bq. I would assume the latter, a map of key values for each

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6200) KeyComparator.compareWithoutRow can be wrong when families have the same prefix

2012-06-17 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13393626#comment-13393626 ] stack commented on HBASE-6200: -- Seems like a 'hole' since elsewhere in KV we compare columns

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6202) Medium tests fail with jdk1.7

2012-06-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13396005#comment-13396005 ] stack commented on HBASE-6202: -- +1 on commit. Medium tests fail with jdk1.7

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6211) Latencies not in jmx

2012-06-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6211: - Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Latencies not in jmx Key:

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6211) Latencies not in jmx

2012-06-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6211: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Trying against hudsonqa Latencies not in jmx

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6211) Latencies not in jmx

2012-06-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13396115#comment-13396115 ] stack commented on HBASE-6211: -- +1 on v2 w/ test. Will commit after hadoopqa is done

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6162) Move KeyValue to hbase-common module

2012-06-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13396128#comment-13396128 ] stack commented on HBASE-6162: -- bq. Jesse - have you by chance tried getting tests to run

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6200) KeyComparator.compareWithoutRow can be wrong when families have the same prefix

2012-06-22 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13399401#comment-13399401 ] stack commented on HBASE-6200: -- Patch looks good. I'm not sure I'm clear what commonPrefix

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6206) Large tests fail with jdk1.7

2012-06-22 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13399403#comment-13399403 ] stack commented on HBASE-6206: -- Interesting that you have to make these changes Jimmy. Why

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6246) Admin.move() without specifying destination calls am.unassign() and does not go through AccessController.

2012-06-22 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13399418#comment-13399418 ] stack commented on HBASE-6246: -- Fix this: {code} + LOG.info(Passed destination

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6207) Add jitter to client retry timer

2012-06-22 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13399589#comment-13399589 ] stack commented on HBASE-6207: -- Elliott Want to say more on why the jitter is needed?

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6207) Add jitter to client retry timer

2012-06-22 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13399594#comment-13399594 ] stack commented on HBASE-6207: -- ... perhaps add to release note? Add jitter

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6259) Unify all of the templates into one templating language

2012-06-22 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13399619#comment-13399619 ] stack commented on HBASE-6259: -- IIRC, our current state spanning jsp and jamon is because the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6224) add Pre and Post coprocessor hooks for BulkLoad

2012-06-22 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13399641#comment-13399641 ] stack commented on HBASE-6224: -- Patch looks good. Its a pity StoreFile has to be made public

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6259) Unify all of the templates into one templating language

2012-06-22 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13399642#comment-13399642 ] stack commented on HBASE-6259: -- Sounds reasonable. What from the list above cited would you

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-3956) Display hbase metrics in UI

2012-06-23 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack reassigned HBASE-3956: Assignee: Elliott Clark Haven't you fixed this boss? Display hbase metrics in UI

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6259) Unify all of the templates into one templating language

2012-06-23 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13399850#comment-13399850 ] stack commented on HBASE-6259: -- HBASE-1473 is an old issue that talks of moving UIs off

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6246) Admin.move without specifying destination does not go through AccessController

2012-06-23 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13399854#comment-13399854 ] stack commented on HBASE-6246: -- @Ted Thanks for catching this (Yeah, if jenkins found the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-3956) Display hbase metrics in UI

2012-06-23 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13399856#comment-13399856 ] stack commented on HBASE-3956: -- Did we add a 'metrics' link along the top of the UI? It

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-3956) Display hbase metrics in UI

2012-06-23 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack resolved HBASE-3956. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed by Elliott (and Enis) See HBASE-6025. Any others? Display hbase

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6025) Expose Hadoop Dynamic Metrics through JSON Rest interface

2012-06-23 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6025: - Attachment: hbase-jmx.patch Update of Enis's patch to go against multi-module hbase. Also changed the text to

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6025) Expose Hadoop Dynamic Metrics through JSON Rest interface

2012-06-23 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6025: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Expose Hadoop Dynamic Metrics through JSON Rest interface

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6025) Expose Hadoop Dynamic Metrics through JSON Rest interface

2012-06-23 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6025: - Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Expose Hadoop Dynamic Metrics through JSON Rest interface

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6025) Expose Hadoop Dynamic Metrics through JSON Rest interface

2012-06-23 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6025: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Expose Hadoop Dynamic Metrics through JSON Rest interface

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6025) Expose Hadoop Dynamic Metrics through JSON Rest interface

2012-06-23 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6025: - Attachment: hbase-jmx2.patch Expose Hadoop Dynamic Metrics through JSON Rest interface

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-3956) Display hbase metrics in UI

2012-06-23 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13399881#comment-13399881 ] stack commented on HBASE-3956: -- Thanks E. Display hbase metrics in UI

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6025) Expose Hadoop Dynamic Metrics through JSON Rest interface

2012-06-23 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13399882#comment-13399882 ] stack commented on HBASE-6025: -- +1 on your patch Elliott (You intended to leave it off the zk

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6267) hbase.store.delete.expired.storefile should be true by default

2012-06-25 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13400693#comment-13400693 ] stack commented on HBASE-6267: -- +1 for true (if above does what I think its doing -- is there

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6267) hbase.store.delete.expired.storefile should be true by default

2012-06-25 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13400695#comment-13400695 ] stack commented on HBASE-6267: -- Is expiredSelection a good name for what is returned out of

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-6270) If all data is locally cached, undo locking and context switching so we are cpu bound

2012-06-26 Thread stack (JIRA)
stack created HBASE-6270: Summary: If all data is locally cached, undo locking and context switching so we are cpu bound Key: HBASE-6270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6270 Project: HBase

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6200) KeyComparator.compareWithoutRow can be wrong when families have the same prefix

2012-06-26 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13401454#comment-13401454 ] stack commented on HBASE-6200: -- Thanks for taking time on perf Jieshan. +1 on commit (It

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5967) OpenDataException because HBaseProtos.ServerLoad cannot be converted to an open data type

2012-06-26 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13401455#comment-13401455 ] stack commented on HBASE-5967: -- Is this same as HBASE-5971? (If so, lets close HBASE-5971)

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6290) Add a function a mark a server as dead and start the recovery the process

2012-06-28 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403207#comment-13403207 ] stack commented on HBASE-6290: -- What would the shell invocation do? Connect to a RS and call

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-3725) HBase increments from old value after delete and write to disk

2012-06-28 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403210#comment-13403210 ] stack commented on HBASE-3725: -- @ShiXing Any chance of a patch. Thanks.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6210) Backport HBASE-6197 to 0.94 and 0.92?

2012-06-28 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403213#comment-13403213 ] stack commented on HBASE-6210: -- +1 on patch. It looks like what was applied to trunk. Is

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6289) ROOT region doesn't get re-assigned in ServerShutdownHandler if the RS is still working but only the RS's ZK node expires.

2012-06-28 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403247#comment-13403247 ] stack commented on HBASE-6289: -- @Maryann Patch looks good. A SSH should not allow the server

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6289) ROOT region doesn't get re-assigned in ServerShutdownHandler if the RS is still working but only the RS's ZK node expires.

2012-06-28 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403307#comment-13403307 ] stack commented on HBASE-6289: -- bq. Any specific reason why we are verifying and then

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6239) [replication] ReplicationSink uses the ts of the first KV for the other KVs in the same row

2012-06-28 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403319#comment-13403319 ] stack commented on HBASE-6239: -- +1 on patch. Pity this is so ugly: {code} +HLog.Entry[]

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6203) Create hbase-it module

2012-06-29 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404067#comment-13404067 ] stack commented on HBASE-6203: -- Nice one Enis. Can you add your 'how-to' above as release

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6203) Create hbase-it module

2012-06-29 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6203: - Attachment: it-doc.txt Patch to add back doc on IT tests. Create hbase-it module

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6203) Create hbase-it module

2012-06-29 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404103#comment-13404103 ] stack commented on HBASE-6203: -- So, to make this module of use, we need to do the Interface

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6289) ROOT region doesn't get re-assigned in ServerShutdownHandler if the RS is still working but only the RS's ZK node expires.

2012-06-29 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404175#comment-13404175 ] stack commented on HBASE-6289: -- The verify of root was added by: {code} Revision 1127158 -

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6281) Assignment need not be called for disabling table regions during clean cluster start up.

2012-06-29 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404180#comment-13404180 ] stack commented on HBASE-6281: -- +1 on patch. Good find. Assignment need

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6241) HBaseCluster interface for interacting with the cluster from system tests

2012-06-29 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404236#comment-13404236 ] stack commented on HBASE-6241: -- @Enis I commented over in https://reviews.apache.org/r/5653/

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6226) move DataBlockEncoding and related classes to hbase-common module

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404432#comment-13404432 ] stack commented on HBASE-6226: -- Matt I put some review up on phabricator. Good stuff.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6265) Calling getTimestamp() on a KV in cp.prePut() causes KV not to be flushed

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404511#comment-13404511 ] stack commented on HBASE-6265: -- +1 on applying to all versions Calling

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-6292) Compact can skip the security access control

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack reassigned HBASE-6292: Assignee: Andrew Purtell (was: ShiXing) Mind taking a look Andrew (and assigning back to ShiXing after)?

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6292) Compact can skip the security access control

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404521#comment-13404521 ] stack commented on HBASE-6292: -- Patch looks good to me. The change on the API is ok? The

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6116) Allow parallel HDFS writes for HLogs.

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404523#comment-13404523 ] stack commented on HBASE-6116: -- @Lars So, you don't see a perf boost writing in parallel?

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6283) [region_mover.rb] Add option to exclude list of hosts on unload instead of just assuming the source node.

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404526#comment-13404526 ] stack commented on HBASE-6283: -- This should IOError or whatever the ruby equiv of FNFE is:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6116) Allow parallel HDFS writes for HLogs.

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404551#comment-13404551 ] stack commented on HBASE-6116: -- Dumb?: For sure the //writing was enabled? If saturated

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6116) Allow parallel HDFS writes for HLogs.

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404614#comment-13404614 ] stack commented on HBASE-6116: -- @Lars If you remove hbase from the equation, what do you see?

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6226) move DataBlockEncoding and related classes to hbase-common module

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6226: - Status: Open (was: Patch Available) move DataBlockEncoding and related classes to hbase-common module

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6226) move DataBlockEncoding and related classes to hbase-common module

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404624#comment-13404624 ] stack commented on HBASE-6226: -- @Matt Ok. Lets get issues I note in another JIRA. Let me

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6226) move DataBlockEncoding and related classes to hbase-common module

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6226: - Attachment: HBASE-6226-v4.patch Retry Matt's last patch move DataBlockEncoding and related

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6292) Compact can skip the security access control

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404626#comment-13404626 ] stack commented on HBASE-6292: -- Thanks for review Andrew. Agree on above.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6210) Backport HBASE-6197 to 0.94

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404628#comment-13404628 ] stack commented on HBASE-6210: -- So, I should apply the attached 0.92 patch but against

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6298) Region balancer not balancing

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404630#comment-13404630 ] stack commented on HBASE-6298: -- Was the problem evident before the master restart Dave? Its

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6296) Refactor EventType to track its own ExecutorService type

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6296: - Attachment: 6296v1.txt Minor change to make spacing consistent and made a method package private rather than

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6296) Refactor EventType to track its own ExecutorService type

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6296: - Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Refactor EventType to track its own ExecutorService type

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6296) Refactor EventType to track its own ExecutorService type

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6296: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Refactor EventType to track its own ExecutorService type

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6297) Backport HBASE-6195 to 0.92

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404636#comment-13404636 ] stack commented on HBASE-6297: -- +1 Backport HBASE-6195 to 0.92

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6298) Region balancer not balancing

2012-06-30 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404637#comment-13404637 ] stack commented on HBASE-6298: -- Its disturbing the master is so bad at math. Do you see

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6296) Refactor EventType to track its own ExecutorService type

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6296: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Refactor EventType to track its own ExecutorService type

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6296) Refactor EventType to track its own ExecutorService type

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6296: - Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Refactor EventType to track its own ExecutorService type

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6296) Refactor EventType to track its own ExecutorService type

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6296: - Attachment: 6296v1.txt Retry Refactor EventType to track its own ExecutorService type

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6298) Region balancer not balancing

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404939#comment-13404939 ] stack commented on HBASE-6298: -- @Dave Want to try what the lads suggest? Change config and

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-6301) Fix hadoopqa script warnings and findbugs counts

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
stack created HBASE-6301: Summary: Fix hadoopqa script warnings and findbugs counts Key: HBASE-6301 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6301 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6265) Calling getTimestamp() on a KV in cp.prePut() causes KV not to be flushed

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404948#comment-13404948 ] stack commented on HBASE-6265: -- I made hbase-6301 to fix hadoopqa counts.

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-6210) Backport HBASE-6197 to 0.94

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack resolved HBASE-6210. -- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Committed to 0.94. Resolving. Backport

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6300) Master should not ignore event RS_ZK_REGION_OPENED when regionState is null or unexpected.

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13405040#comment-13405040 ] stack commented on HBASE-6300: -- Sounds good Maryann. Why do you think RegionState was null?

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6299) RS starts region open while fails ack to HMaster.sendRegionOpen() causes inconsistency in HMaster's region state and a series of successive problems.

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13405044#comment-13405044 ] stack commented on HBASE-6299: -- Good stuff Maryann. Your patch looks good as bandaid till we

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6295) Possible performance improvement in client batch operations: presplit and send in background

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6295: - Component/s: performance Tags: noob Labels: noob (was: ) Making it noob. Could be fun

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-6302) Document how to run integration tests

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
stack created HBASE-6302: Summary: Document how to run integration tests Key: HBASE-6302 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6302 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Components:

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6302) Document how to run integration tests

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6302: - Priority: Blocker (was: Major) Document how to run integration tests

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6203) Create hbase-it module

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13405056#comment-13405056 ] stack commented on HBASE-6203: -- I made HBASE-6302 for doc. after we settle on how IT stuff is

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6289) ROOT region doesn't get re-assigned in ServerShutdownHandler if the RS is still working but only the RS's ZK node expires.

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6289: - Status: Open (was: Patch Available) ROOT region doesn't get re-assigned in ServerShutdownHandler if the RS

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6289) ROOT region doesn't get re-assigned in ServerShutdownHandler if the RS is still working but only the RS's ZK node expires.

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6289: - Attachment: HBASE-6289-v2.patch Retry ROOT region doesn't get re-assigned in

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6289) ROOT region doesn't get re-assigned in ServerShutdownHandler if the RS is still working but only the RS's ZK node expires.

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6289: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) ROOT region doesn't get re-assigned in ServerShutdownHandler if the RS

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6241) HBaseCluster interface for interacting with the cluster from system tests

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13405066#comment-13405066 ] stack commented on HBASE-6241: -- Feedback up on RB Enis. Thanks.

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6285) HBase master should log INFO message when it attempts to assign a region

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6285: - Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6226) move DataBlockEncoding and related classes to hbase-common module

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-6226: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) @Matt It would if I submitted the patch... Ugh Lets see.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6303) HCD.setCompressionType should use Enum support for storing compression types as strings

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13405290#comment-13405290 ] stack commented on HBASE-6303: -- Seems good to me Andrew. So, if I specify CRAPPY instead of

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6293) HMaster does not go down while splitting logs even if explicit shutdown is called.

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13405294#comment-13405294 ] stack commented on HBASE-6293: -- Good find Rajesh. HMaster does not go down

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6117) Revisit default condition added to Switch cases in Trunk

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13405295#comment-13405295 ] stack commented on HBASE-6117: -- Is the logging redundant Ram? Is the state logged earlier?

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-3725) HBase increments from old value after delete and write to disk

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13405298#comment-13405298 ] stack commented on HBASE-3725: -- Is this a fix for 0.92 only ShiXing? Doing a get instead of

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-2730) Expose RS work queue contents on web UI

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13405303#comment-13405303 ] stack commented on HBASE-2730: -- Good stuff. I agree w/ Andrew that best place to put it at

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6303) HCD.setCompressionType should use Enum support for storing compression types as strings

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13405319#comment-13405319 ] stack commented on HBASE-6303: -- +1 then HCD.setCompressionType should use

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6039) Remove HMasterInterface and replace with something similar to RegionServerStatusProtocol

2012-07-02 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13405329#comment-13405329 ] stack commented on HBASE-6039: -- I added comments up on RB Gregory. Good work.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6300) Master should not ignore event RS_ZK_REGION_OPENED when regionState is null or unexpected.

2012-07-03 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13405661#comment-13405661 ] stack commented on HBASE-6300: -- Agreed. This is a good catch Maryann.

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >