[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-17696) Vectorized reader does not seem to be pushing down projection columns in certain code paths

2017-10-31 Thread Ferdinand Xu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16233557#comment-16233557 ] Ferdinand Xu commented on HIVE-17696: - Push to branch 2 as well. > Vectorized reader

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-17696) Vectorized reader does not seem to be pushing down projection columns in certain code paths

2017-10-30 Thread Vihang Karajgaonkar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16226071#comment-16226071 ] Vihang Karajgaonkar commented on HIVE-17696: Thanks [~Ferd] Can you also pleas

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-17696) Vectorized reader does not seem to be pushing down projection columns in certain code paths

2017-10-30 Thread Ferdinand Xu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16226067#comment-16226067 ] Ferdinand Xu commented on HIVE-17696: - Thanks [~vihangk1] for pointing this out. I fil

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-17696) Vectorized reader does not seem to be pushing down projection columns in certain code paths

2017-10-26 Thread Vihang Karajgaonkar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16221231#comment-16221231 ] Vihang Karajgaonkar commented on HIVE-17696: Hi [~Ferd] I took a look at the p

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-17696) Vectorized reader does not seem to be pushing down projection columns in certain code paths

2017-10-25 Thread Hive QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16218228#comment-16218228 ] Hive QA commented on HIVE-17696: Here are the results of testing the latest attachment:

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-17696) Vectorized reader does not seem to be pushing down projection columns in certain code paths

2017-10-24 Thread Ferdinand Xu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16217937#comment-16217937 ] Ferdinand Xu commented on HIVE-17696: - Two changes here: * DataWritableReadSupport did

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-17696) Vectorized reader does not seem to be pushing down projection columns in certain code paths

2017-10-24 Thread Vihang Karajgaonkar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16217210#comment-16217210 ] Vihang Karajgaonkar commented on HIVE-17696: Hi [~Ferd] I see you attached a v

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-17696) Vectorized reader does not seem to be pushing down projection columns in certain code paths

2017-10-22 Thread Hive QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16214566#comment-16214566 ] Hive QA commented on HIVE-17696: Here are the results of testing the latest attachment:

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-17696) Vectorized reader does not seem to be pushing down projection columns in certain code paths

2017-10-20 Thread Vihang Karajgaonkar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16213467#comment-16213467 ] Vihang Karajgaonkar commented on HIVE-17696: +1 Thanks for the patch [~Ferd]

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-17696) Vectorized reader does not seem to be pushing down projection columns in certain code paths

2017-10-19 Thread Hive QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16211650#comment-16211650 ] Hive QA commented on HIVE-17696: Here are the results of testing the latest attachment: