[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-23596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17125151#comment-17125151 ]
Gopal Vijayaraghavan commented on HIVE-23596: --------------------------------------------- LGTM - +1 Will add extra comments in the LlapTaskScheduler, since this takes advantage of arbitrary container-ids which have a full 64 bit range & do not get used outside of the runtime of the query (unlike say, task-ids, which show up in filenames). The LLAP daemon side doesn't care about a container-id, since we use a 1:1 correspondence between containers & tasks in LLAP. So a "tagged pointer" or "colored pointer" equivalent implementation is safe. > Encode guaranteed task information in containerId > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HIVE-23596 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-23596 > Project: Hive > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Mustafa Iman > Assignee: Mustafa Iman > Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Time Spent: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > We should avoid calling LlapTaskScheduler to get initial isguaranteed flag > for all the tasks. It causes arbitrary delays in sending tasks out. Since > communicator is a single thread, any blocking there delays all the tasks. > There are [https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-4192] and > [https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-23589] for a proper solution to > this. However, that requires a Tez release which seems far right now. We can > replace the current hack with another hack that does not require locking. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)