HonahX closed issue #541: Pyarrow type error
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/541
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: is
bigluck commented on issue #541:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/541#issuecomment-2042792612
@Fokko it sounds good to me! :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to t
Fokko commented on issue #541:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/541#issuecomment-2042789157
Ciao @bigluck. Thanks for jumping in here. Until V3 is finalized, we can add
a flag to cast a nanosecond to a microsecond precision. Would that work for you?
--
This is an autom
bigluck commented on issue #541:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/541#issuecomment-2042703204
So, `timestamp_ns` & `timestamptz_ns` has been added on the `v3` of the
iceberg specs, pyiceberg right now supports `v1` &`v2`.
In my case, the column has been generated b
bigluck commented on issue #541:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/541#issuecomment-2042634726
I'm facing a similar issue in my code.
Tested using main@7fcdb8d25dfa2498ba98a2b8e8d2b327d85fa7c9 (the commit after
`Minor fixes, #523 followup (#563)` and `Cast data to I
kevinjqliu commented on issue #541:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/541#issuecomment-2016890280
Hey @dev-goyal, do you mind posting a snippet of your example above? I think
this is very similar to #520
In #520, the iceberg table is created with pyarrow schema. Int
dev-goyal commented on issue #541:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/541#issuecomment-2016573605
Thanks @Fokko, makes sense! I was able to simply reduce precision on my end
so it's not a big deal, but I figured it couldn't hurt to raise this.
I wrote these data usin
Fokko commented on issue #541:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/541#issuecomment-2016497750
@dev-goyal Thanks for raising this. It looks like that's a timestamp with
nanosecond precision. Support for nanosecond timestamps is currently being
added in the latest specificat
dev-goyal opened a new issue, #541:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/541
### Apache Iceberg version
0.6.0 (latest release)
### Please describe the bug 🐞
Given a table like so:
`In [36]: table
Out[36]:
matches(
...
14: player_last_
