[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-2671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17554207#comment-17554207
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on KUDU-2671:
-------------------------------------------------------
Commit 9091f31cfc5c102b6a734fa20b015735251392d4 in kudu's branch
refs/heads/master from Alexey Serbin
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=kudu.git;h=9091f31cf ]
KUDU-2671 refactor PartitionSchema::CreatePartitions()
This patch refactors the code of the PartitionSchema::CreatePartitions()
method and the code around its invocations, addressing a few TODOs.
As a consequence, this patch fixes a bug in the CreateTable path: prior
to this patch, a client could submit a CreateTableRequestPB request such
that the order of ranges in CreateTableRequestPB::split_rows_range_bounds
and CreateTableRequestPB::partition_schema::custom_hash_schema_ranges
were different, and the result table would be created with wrong hash
schemas.
For example:
requested:
{{range_boundary_a0, range_boundary_a1}, hash_schema_a}
{{range_boundary_b0, range_boundary_b1}, hash_schema_b}
created:
{{range_boundary_a0, range_boundary_a1}, hash_schema_b}
{{range_boundary_b0, range_boundary_b1}, hash_schema_a}
I'm planning to add corresponding test scenario to catch the regressions
in a separate changelist for ease of reviewing and tracking the changes.
However, I updated the existing test scenarios affected by this change.
Change-Id: I5bac1f8ee349577e2f912530a28776415ed0a5b0
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/18582
Tested-by: Alexey Serbin <ale...@apache.org>
Reviewed-by: Abhishek Chennaka <achenn...@cloudera.com>
Reviewed-by: Attila Bukor <abu...@apache.org>
> Change hash number for range partitioning
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: KUDU-2671
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-2671
> Project: Kudu
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: client, java, master, server
> Affects Versions: 1.8.0
> Reporter: yangz
> Assignee: Mahesh Reddy
> Priority: Major
> Labels: feature, roadmap-candidate, scalability
> Attachments: 屏幕快照 2019-01-24 下午12.03.41.png
>
>
> For our usage, the kudu schema design isn't flexible enough.
> We create our table for day range such as dt='20181112' as hive table.
> But our data size change a lot every day, for one day it will be 50G， but for
> some other day it will be 500G. For this case, it be hard to set the hash
> schema. If too big, for most case, it will be too wasteful. But too small,
> there is a performance problem in the case of a large amount of data.
>
> So we suggest a solution we can change the hash number by the history data of
> a table.
> for example
> # we create schema with one estimated value.
> # we collect the data size by day range
> # we create new day range partition by our collected day size.
> We use this feature for half a year, and it work well. We hope this feature
> will be useful for the community. Maybe the solution isn't so complete.
> Please help us make it better.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
