[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-2671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17555730#comment-17555730 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on KUDU-2671: ------------------------------------------------------- Commit 45a7857b494703ef5cf9da8671c75da88d5fc16d in kudu's branch refs/heads/master from Alexey Serbin [ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=kudu.git;h=45a7857b4 ] [rpc] report the names of the unsupported feature flags While introducing feature flags in the scope of KUDU-2671, I noticed that missing feature flags are not reported in the error messages (at least, I was looking at master_proxy_rpc.cc). This patch addresses that, making corresponding error messages more actionable. As for test coverage, I updated a couple of test scenarios in dynamic_multi_master-test.cc to provide initial coverage. In addition, a follow-up patch will add a new test scenario into flex_partitioning_client-test.cc. Change-Id: Id9805dc3fb4ba0a734ca92198bc5dc6449f588b7 Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/18631 Tested-by: Kudu Jenkins Reviewed-by: Attila Bukor <abu...@apache.org> > Change hash number for range partitioning > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: KUDU-2671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-2671 > Project: Kudu > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: client, java, master, server > Affects Versions: 1.8.0 > Reporter: yangz > Assignee: Mahesh Reddy > Priority: Major > Labels: feature, roadmap-candidate, scalability > Attachments: 屏幕快照 2019-01-24 下午12.03.41.png > > > For our usage, the kudu schema design isn't flexible enough. > We create our table for day range such as dt='20181112' as hive table. > But our data size change a lot every day, for one day it will be 50G, but for > some other day it will be 500G. For this case, it be hard to set the hash > schema. If too big, for most case, it will be too wasteful. But too small, > there is a performance problem in the case of a large amount of data. > > So we suggest a solution we can change the hash number by the history data of > a table. > for example > # we create schema with one estimated value. > # we collect the data size by day range > # we create new day range partition by our collected day size. > We use this feature for half a year, and it work well. We hope this feature > will be useful for the community. Maybe the solution isn't so complete. > Please help us make it better. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.7#820007)