zacharymorn commented on a change in pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#discussion_r628697141
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java
##
@@ -488,8 +503,35 @@ public Status checkIndex() throws IOException {
*
zacharymorn commented on a change in pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#discussion_r628696357
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java
##
@@ -731,40 +747,188 @@ public Status checkIndex(List onlySegments)
throws
jpountz commented on a change in pull request #91:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/91#discussion_r628551730
##
File path:
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/bkd/MutablePointsReaderUtils.java
##
@@ -35,63 +37,60 @@
MutablePointsReaderUtils() {}
-
jpountz commented on pull request #101:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/101#issuecomment-834791219
> The last two are optimization techniques not mentioned in the paper I
think?
To be honest I didn't read the paper recently so it's possible I diverged a
bit from it.
gsmiller commented on pull request #127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/127#issuecomment-834786325
@rmuir just posted a new revision that optimizes non-overlapping range cases
with its own implementation. It's a pretty big change from the previous
version, but I'm curious to
mocobeta commented on pull request #130:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/130#issuecomment-834649989
I think few people care about the format documentation, but at least it will
not hurt anything (...and might be helpful for advanced users).
I'll keep open it for a while for
mocobeta opened a new pull request #130:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/130
(Maybe) trivial documentation change. Current format description of
[TermVectorsFormat](https://lucene.apache.org/core/8_8_2/core/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene50/Lucene50TermVectorsFormat.html)
is a
gautamworah96 commented on pull request #108:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/108#issuecomment-834622966
Some closing notes: We found the current gradle checksum verification
functionality unsuitable for our use case.
The current functionality records all dependencies
gsmiller commented on pull request #127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/127#issuecomment-834352411
(In the meantime, I just pushed a small revision that does a more efficient
binary search for multi-valued cases by keeping track of the last seen
elementary interval, taking
gsmiller commented on pull request #127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/127#issuecomment-834346001
Oh yeah, good point @rmuir! I actually wonder if a separate implementation
of the segment-tree counter (`LongRangeCounter`) would make sense for this
typical case. The entire
rmuir commented on pull request #127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/127#issuecomment-834312458
in an overlapping case, we can't do the optimization. my suggestion was for
a (i think typical?) case where ranges are non-overlapping (facets i see such
as price ranges). in that
rmuir commented on a change in pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#discussion_r628122895
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java
##
@@ -488,8 +503,35 @@ public Status checkIndex() throws IOException {
*
dweiss commented on a change in pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#discussion_r628015890
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java
##
@@ -731,40 +747,188 @@ public Status checkIndex(List onlySegments)
throws
zacharymorn commented on a change in pull request #101:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/101#discussion_r627978058
##
File path:
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/BlockMaxMaxscoreScorer.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,339 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
zacharymorn commented on a change in pull request #101:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/101#discussion_r627975325
##
File path:
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/BlockMaxMaxscoreScorer.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,339 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
zacharymorn commented on pull request #101:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/101#issuecomment-834114823
> I played with your branch in order to try to speed things up a bit and I'm
getting a bit closer to our current WAND implementation:
zacharymorn commented on a change in pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#discussion_r627960571
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java
##
@@ -605,6 +610,15 @@ public Status checkIndex(List onlySegments) throws
zacharymorn commented on a change in pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#discussion_r627960267
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java
##
@@ -810,6 +976,8 @@ public Status checkIndex(List onlySegments) throws
zacharymorn commented on a change in pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#discussion_r627960267
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java
##
@@ -810,6 +976,8 @@ public Status checkIndex(List onlySegments) throws
zacharymorn commented on a change in pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#discussion_r627959173
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java
##
@@ -731,40 +747,188 @@ public Status checkIndex(List onlySegments)
throws
20 matches
Mail list logo
