Zach Chen created LUCENE-10076:
--
Summary: Luke test assertion failure from TestOverviewImpl
Key: LUCENE-10076
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10076
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17406285#comment-17406285
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10068:
--
There is nothing in HPPC that would help y
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17406256#comment-17406256
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10068:
--
why do we need a cache on ordinal lookups
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17406249#comment-17406249
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-10068:
-
It's also possible HPPC has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17406245#comment-17406245
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-10070:
-
Wow, good catch!
> "count a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17406244#comment-17406244
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-10071:
-
Ideally we would be able to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-10058:
Fix Version/s: main (9.0)
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-10051.
-
Fix Version/s: 8.10
Resolution: Fixed
> lucene branch_8x run ant run-ta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17406237#comment-17406237
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-10051:
-
Thanks [~xiaoshi_2021]!
> l
mikemccand merged pull request #2559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2559
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reopened LUCENE-9969:
> DirectoryTaxonomyReader.taxoArray占用内存较大导致系统OOM宕机
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17406232#comment-17406232
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-9969:
I think we should reopen this –
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17406228#comment-17406228
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-10067:
-
Yes, thank you [~jpountz]!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17406227#comment-17406227
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-10059:
-
Did we already backport this
mikemccand commented on a change in pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#discussion_r697884682
##
File path: lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/TestUtil.java
##
@@ -321,6 +326,11 @@ public static void syncConcurrentMerges(MergeSch
mikemccand commented on pull request #224:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/224#issuecomment-907641298
So awesome that `SimpleText` is finally getting a skipping implementation!
Thank you @wuda0112!
Have you tried stressing out the new code by running all Lucene unit-tests
mikemccand commented on a change in pull request #179:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/179#discussion_r697880899
##
File path:
lucene/facet/src/test/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/TestTaxonomyCombined.java
##
@@ -366,9 +366,9 @@ public void testReaderBasic() throw
JavaCoderCff commented on pull request #271:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/271#issuecomment-907637143
Parents, siblings and children. I'm not sure why.
I also think SoftRefrence is not the optimal solution, but it should be an
urgent solution, at least our app will not c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
xiaoshi updated LUCENE-10051:
-
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
> lucene branch_8x run ant run-task error
> -
mikemccand commented on pull request #271:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/271#issuecomment-907633653
These arrays are in general a crazy costly part of using taxonomy facets ...
we should explore more efficient alternatives. E.g. if the Lucene user is only
using a single level
mikemccand commented on pull request #271:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/271#issuecomment-907633158
Do you know how large your Taxonomy index is (how many unique `FacetLabel`s)?
In your application, are all three arrays being allocated (`parents`,
`siblings` and `childre
rmuir commented on pull request #271:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/271#issuecomment-907612690
Yeah, SoftReference is never the solution. We should add this class to our
forbidden apis list.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messa
22 matches
Mail list logo
