[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17501314#comment-17501314
]
kkewwei edited comment on LUCENE-10448 at 3/6/22, 6:21 AM:
---
Yes, bytes may be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17501314#comment-17501314
]
kkewwei edited comment on LUCENE-10448 at 3/6/22, 5:57 AM:
---
Yes, bytes may be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17501314#comment-17501314
]
kkewwei edited comment on LUCENE-10448 at 3/6/22, 5:54 AM:
---
Yes, bytes may be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17501314#comment-17501314
]
kkewwei edited comment on LUCENE-10448 at 3/6/22, 5:44 AM:
---
Yes, bytes may be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17501314#comment-17501314
]
kkewwei edited comment on LUCENE-10448 at 3/6/22, 5:43 AM:
---
Yes, bytes may be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17501863#comment-17501863
]
Lu Xugang commented on LUCENE-10120:
Thanks your advice
> Lazy initialize FixedBitSet in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17501822#comment-17501822
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10425:
--
seems far too specialized, similar to LUCENE-10396.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17501803#comment-17501803
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10120:
---
My intuition is that the only queries that end up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17501791#comment-17501791
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10078:
---
These two policies already have a concept of a "minimum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17501790#comment-17501790
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10425:
---
This would require a new API on PostingsEnum so I'll
jpountz commented on pull request #672:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/672#issuecomment-1059807640
@rmuir I'd be curious to get your thoughts after recent changes that applied
some of your feedback.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
jpountz commented on a change in pull request #672:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/672#discussion_r820132595
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/BooleanQuery.java
##
@@ -191,51 +191,55 @@ boolean isPureDisjunction() {
return
jpountz commented on pull request #688:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/688#issuecomment-1059806742
Thinking through this a bit more, I imagine that this is the reason why you
made this API optional. We still like the set the bar quite high to add new
APIs to PostingsEnum so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17501785#comment-17501785
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10311:
--
Commit
jpountz commented on pull request #688:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/688#issuecomment-1059803598
The use-case makes sense to me, but like @msokolov I'm worried that this
could limit future implementations. For instance if we were to encode postings
as a bitset, we wouldn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17501781#comment-17501781
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10311:
--
Commit
jpountz merged pull request #724:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/724
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-10453.
---
Fix Version/s: 9.1
Resolution: Fixed
> Speed up VectorUtil#squareDistance
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17501777#comment-17501777
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10455:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17501779#comment-17501779
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10453:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17501778#comment-17501778
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10455:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-10455.
---
Fix Version/s: 9.1
Resolution: Fixed
> IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17501776#comment-17501776
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10455:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17501775#comment-17501775
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10453:
--
Commit
jpountz merged pull request #725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/725
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17501771#comment-17501771
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10455:
--
Commit
jpountz merged pull request #729:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/729
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jpountz commented on pull request #730:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/730#issuecomment-1059800642
Why is it a performance bug, do we have scorers that are slow to do an
`advance(NO_MORE_DOCS)`?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
jianping weng updated LUCENE-10456:
---
Summary: Implement Weight#count for MultiRangeQuery (was: support
wjp719 opened a new pull request #731:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/731
# Description
for one dimension MultiRangeQuery, we can firstly merge overlapping ranges
to have some unconnected ranges, then the doc count of this multiRangeQuery is
the sum of
jianping weng created LUCENE-10456:
--
Summary: support MultiRangeQuery#count()
Key: LUCENE-10456
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10456
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type:
iverase commented on pull request #709:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/709#issuecomment-1059725486
I reverted the changes to the BKD tree as it is inconsistent with the
current AssertingLeafReader implementation.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
spyk commented on pull request #380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/380#issuecomment-1059723009
Thank you @magibney for getting back on this!
> @spyk thanks for your patience, and for keeping the PR up-to-date. If you
can add a CHANGES.txt entry, that's probably
33 matches
Mail list logo
