[GitHub] [lucene] jpountz commented on a diff in pull request #833: LUCENE-10411: Add NN vectors support to ExitableDirectoryReader

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
jpountz commented on code in PR #833: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/833#discussion_r857318802 ## lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ExitableDirectoryReader.java: ## @@ -323,6 +325,35 @@ public int nextDoc() throws IOException { : sortedSetDocVal

[GitHub] [lucene] jpountz merged pull request #827: LUCENE-8836: Speed up TermsEnum#lookupOrd on increasing sequences of ords.

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
jpountz merged PR #827: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/827 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8836) Optimize DocValues TermsDict to continue scanning from the last position when possible

2022-04-25 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17527349#comment-17527349 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-8836: - Commi

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8836) Optimize DocValues TermsDict to continue scanning from the last position when possible

2022-04-25 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17527350#comment-17527350 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-8836: - Commi

[GitHub] [lucene] boicehuang commented on pull request #816: LUCENE-10519: ThreadLocal.remove under G1GC takes 100% CPU

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
boicehuang commented on PR #816: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/816#issuecomment-1108216412 > `./gradlew check` still fails. I have successfully run `gradle :lucene:core:spotlessApply` and `gradle :lucene:check` locally. Please run the CI again, thanks. BTW, sorry fo

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-8836) Optimize DocValues TermsDict to continue scanning from the last position when possible

2022-04-25 Thread Adrien Grand (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-8836. -- Fix Version/s: 9.2 Resolution: Fixed I merged a change that only improves lookupOrd, an

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10529) TestTaxonomyFacetAssociations may have floating point issues

2022-04-25 Thread Tomoko Uchida (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17527419#comment-17527419 ] Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10529: I saw the same test fails but with a d

[GitHub] [lucene] mocobeta commented on pull request #805: LUCENE-10493: factor out Viterbi algorithm and share it between kuromoji and nori

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
mocobeta commented on PR #805: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/805#issuecomment-1108428861 I'm merging this and will observe the nightly benchmark (this shouldn't affect the analysis performance). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the me

[GitHub] [lucene] mocobeta merged pull request #805: LUCENE-10493: factor out Viterbi algorithm and share it between kuromoji and nori

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
mocobeta merged PR #805: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/805 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10493) Can we unify the viterbi search logic in the tokenizers of kuromoji and nori?

2022-04-25 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17527428#comment-17527428 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10493: -- Co

[GitHub] [lucene] dweiss commented on pull request #834: Upgrade spotless and use runToFixMessage for 'gradlew tidy' hint.

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
dweiss commented on PR #834: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/834#issuecomment-1108438352 I removed the hack and updated spotless. Works fine for me. I just noticed that any gradle error now returns the 'something went wrong' message though. ![image](https://user-images.gi

[GitHub] [lucene] uschindler commented on a diff in pull request #834: Upgrade spotless and use runToFixMessage for 'gradlew tidy' hint.

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
uschindler commented on code in PR #834: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/834#discussion_r857519990 ## gradle/validation/spotless.gradle: ## @@ -110,10 +110,8 @@ configure(project(":lucene").subprojects) { prj -> check.dependsOn v v.dependsOn ":checkJdkIntern

[GitHub] [lucene] iverase commented on pull request #756: LUCENE-10470: [Tessellator] Prevent bridges that introduce collinear edges

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
iverase commented on PR #756: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/756#issuecomment-1108472913 Hi @yixunx, I had a look to the polygon and it seems to be a totally different type of error and I would prefer to handle it as a separate issue. In the meanwhile I propose to push th

[GitHub] [lucene] dweiss commented on a diff in pull request #834: Upgrade spotless and use runToFixMessage for 'gradlew tidy' hint.

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
dweiss commented on code in PR #834: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/834#discussion_r857552731 ## gradle/validation/spotless.gradle: ## @@ -110,10 +110,8 @@ configure(project(":lucene").subprojects) { prj -> check.dependsOn v v.dependsOn ":checkJdkInternalsE

[GitHub] [lucene] dweiss commented on pull request #832: LUCENE-10523: remove @Slow annotation

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
dweiss commented on PR #832: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/832#issuecomment-1108486770 I'm fine with this. Reasons for Slow (and other test groups) are various. I use Slow in projects where certain tests are indeed slow by nature - have to unpack the distribution/ fork processe

[GitHub] [lucene] rmuir commented on pull request #834: Upgrade spotless and use runToFixMessage for 'gradlew tidy' hint.

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
rmuir commented on PR #834: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/834#issuecomment-1108487568 > I just noticed that any gradle error now returns the 'something went wrong' message though. This only happens on windows. Something is off with the `%ERRORLEVEL%` stuff in the .bat fi

[GitHub] [lucene] dweiss commented on pull request #834: Upgrade spotless and use runToFixMessage for 'gradlew tidy' hint.

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
dweiss commented on PR #834: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/834#issuecomment-1108489133 Will take a look -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsu

[GitHub] [lucene] rmuir commented on pull request #834: Upgrade spotless and use runToFixMessage for 'gradlew tidy' hint.

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
rmuir commented on PR #834: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/834#issuecomment-1108490605 I took a look, it seems to me at a lance: * any error from WrapperDownloader will go to `:fail` section via an explicit GOTO: `IF %ERRORLEVEL% NEQ 0 goto fail` * any error from gradlew it

[GitHub] [lucene] dweiss commented on pull request #834: Upgrade spotless and use runToFixMessage for 'gradlew tidy' hint.

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
dweiss commented on PR #834: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/834#issuecomment-1108492891 Yeah, I have a fix already. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific commen

[GitHub] [lucene] dweiss commented on pull request #834: Upgrade spotless and use runToFixMessage for 'gradlew tidy' hint.

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
dweiss commented on PR #834: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/834#issuecomment-1108498260 This fixes the script logic for windows: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/835 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to G

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10386) Add BOM module for ease of dependency management in dependent projects

2022-04-25 Thread Petr Portnov (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17527451#comment-17527451 ] Petr Portnov commented on LUCENE-10386: --- Hi there! I've opened a PR with the imp

[GitHub] [lucene] dweiss merged pull request #835: Fix JVM error branch logic.

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
dweiss merged PR #835: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/835 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.o

[GitHub] [lucene] dweiss commented on pull request #835: Fix JVM error branch logic.

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
dweiss commented on PR #835: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/835#issuecomment-1108513010 I think I made a logic mistake when I looked at what Robert pushed to the sh one, my fault. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please lo

[GitHub] [lucene] uschindler commented on a diff in pull request #834: Upgrade spotless and use runToFixMessage for 'gradlew tidy' hint.

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
uschindler commented on code in PR #834: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/834#discussion_r857577924 ## gradle/validation/spotless.gradle: ## @@ -110,10 +110,8 @@ configure(project(":lucene").subprojects) { prj -> check.dependsOn v v.dependsOn ":checkJdkIntern

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10386) Add BOM module for ease of dependency management in dependent projects

2022-04-25 Thread Dawid Weiss (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17527459#comment-17527459 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10386: -- Hi Petr. I saw the PR but I'm not followin

[GitHub] [lucene] dweiss commented on a diff in pull request #834: Upgrade spotless and use runToFixMessage for 'gradlew tidy' hint.

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
dweiss commented on code in PR #834: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/834#discussion_r857581902 ## gradle/validation/spotless.gradle: ## @@ -110,10 +110,8 @@ configure(project(":lucene").subprojects) { prj -> check.dependsOn v v.dependsOn ":checkJdkInternalsE

[GitHub] [lucene] dweiss commented on a diff in pull request #834: Upgrade spotless and use runToFixMessage for 'gradlew tidy' hint.

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
dweiss commented on code in PR #834: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/834#discussion_r857583962 ## gradle/validation/spotless.gradle: ## @@ -110,10 +110,8 @@ configure(project(":lucene").subprojects) { prj -> check.dependsOn v v.dependsOn ":checkJdkInternalsE

[GitHub] [lucene] dweiss merged pull request #834: Upgrade spotless and use runToFixMessage for 'gradlew tidy' hint.

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
dweiss merged PR #834: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/834 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.o

[GitHub] [lucene] dweiss commented on pull request #834: Upgrade spotless and use runToFixMessage for 'gradlew tidy' hint.

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
dweiss commented on PR #834: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/834#issuecomment-1108529546 Thanks @uschindler -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To u

[GitHub] [lucene] rmuir commented on pull request #816: LUCENE-10519: ThreadLocal.remove under G1GC takes 100% CPU

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
rmuir commented on PR #816: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/816#issuecomment-1108554479 Thanks for getting the tests passing. I'm honestly torn on this issue, here are my thoughts: 1. If you have 100% cpu in `java.lang.ThreadLocal.remove()`, you are creating and destroyi

[GitHub] [lucene] rmuir commented on pull request #834: Upgrade spotless and use runToFixMessage for 'gradlew tidy' hint.

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
rmuir commented on PR #834: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/834#issuecomment-1108562973 Thank you for patching spotless and integrating the fix @dweiss ! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the U

[GitHub] [lucene] yixunx commented on pull request #756: LUCENE-10470: [Tessellator] Prevent bridges that introduce collinear edges

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
yixunx commented on PR #756: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/756#issuecomment-1108799875 Sounds good, thank you for looking into this @iverase. I think it makes sense to merge this PR as you suggested, and I'll open separate tickets for the latest failing shape and for my questio

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-10533) SpellChecker.formGrams is missing bounds check

2022-04-25 Thread Kevin Risden (Jira)
Kevin Risden created LUCENE-10533: - Summary: SpellChecker.formGrams is missing bounds check Key: LUCENE-10533 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10533 Project: Lucene - Core Is

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8836) Optimize DocValues TermsDict to continue scanning from the last position when possible

2022-04-25 Thread Bruno Roustant (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17527666#comment-17527666 ] Bruno Roustant commented on LUCENE-8836: Thanks [~jpountz] for this simplified i

[GitHub] [lucene] risdenk opened a new pull request, #836: LUCENE-10533: SpellChecker.formGrams is missing bounds check

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
risdenk opened a new pull request, #836: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/836 # Description SpellChecker.formGrams is missing a bounds check that results in NegativeArraySizeException in some cases. # Solution This adds a bounds check to SpellChecker.formGrams

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-10533) SpellChecker.formGrams is missing bounds check

2022-04-25 Thread Kevin Risden (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevin Risden updated LUCENE-10533: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > SpellChecker.formGrams is missing bounds check > -

[GitHub] [lucene] rmuir commented on pull request #836: LUCENE-10533: SpellChecker.formGrams is missing bounds check

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
rmuir commented on PR #836: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/836#issuecomment-1108899794 Should we really return no-results if a user asks to spellcheck the empty string? Or maybe just a better, more obvious exception? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.

[GitHub] [lucene] risdenk commented on pull request #836: LUCENE-10533: SpellChecker.formGrams is missing bounds check

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
risdenk commented on PR #836: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/836#issuecomment-1108904174 Yea thats a 100% valid question and one I'm not sure what the right answer is. I tried to find a definition of what is expected here. I'm not tied to this solution, its just the least intrus

[GitHub] [lucene] rmuir commented on pull request #836: LUCENE-10533: SpellChecker.formGrams is missing bounds check

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
rmuir commented on PR #836: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/836#issuecomment-1108916100 OK i looked into some surrounding behavior in suggest module: Looks like returning empty list is what DirectSpellChecker does: https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/main/lucene/su

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-10534) MinFloatFunction / MaxFloatFunction exists check is slow

2022-04-25 Thread Kevin Risden (Jira)
Kevin Risden created LUCENE-10534: - Summary: MinFloatFunction / MaxFloatFunction exists check is slow Key: LUCENE-10534 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10534 Project: Lucene - Core

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-10534) MinFloatFunction / MaxFloatFunction exists check can be slow

2022-04-25 Thread Kevin Risden (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevin Risden updated LUCENE-10534: -- Summary: MinFloatFunction / MaxFloatFunction exists check can be slow (was: MinFloatFunction

[GitHub] [lucene] risdenk opened a new pull request, #837: LUCENE-10534: MinFloatFunction / MaxFloatFunction exists check can be slow

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
risdenk opened a new pull request, #837: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/837 # Description `MinFloatFunction` and `MaxFloatFunction` currently check if values exist which can happen twice in the worst case. # Solution This rearranges the logic to only check if

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-10534) MinFloatFunction / MaxFloatFunction exists check can be slow

2022-04-25 Thread Kevin Risden (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevin Risden updated LUCENE-10534: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > MinFloatFunction / MaxFloatFunction exists check can b

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10534) MinFloatFunction / MaxFloatFunction exists check can be slow

2022-04-25 Thread Kevin Risden (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17527735#comment-17527735 ] Kevin Risden commented on LUCENE-10534: --- FWIW I am not 100% sure how to performan

[GitHub] [lucene] risdenk merged pull request #836: LUCENE-10533: SpellChecker.formGrams is missing bounds check

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
risdenk merged PR #836: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/836 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10533) SpellChecker.formGrams is missing bounds check

2022-04-25 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17527738#comment-17527738 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10533: -- Co

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-10533) SpellChecker.formGrams is missing bounds check

2022-04-25 Thread Kevin Risden (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevin Risden updated LUCENE-10533: -- Fix Version/s: 9.1 Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10533) SpellChecker.formGrams is missing bounds check

2022-04-25 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17527740#comment-17527740 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10533: -- Co

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-10533) SpellChecker.formGrams is missing bounds check

2022-04-25 Thread Kevin Risden (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevin Risden updated LUCENE-10533: -- Fix Version/s: 9.2 (was: 9.1) > SpellChecker.formGrams is missing boun

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10534) MinFloatFunction / MaxFloatFunction exists check can be slow

2022-04-25 Thread Chris M. Hostetter (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17527773#comment-17527773 ] Chris M. Hostetter commented on LUCENE-10534: - {quote}This is only needed w

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10534) MinFloatFunction / MaxFloatFunction exists check can be slow

2022-04-25 Thread Chris M. Hostetter (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17527778#comment-17527778 ] Chris M. Hostetter commented on LUCENE-10534: - Maybe a diff approach to spe

[GitHub] [lucene] jaisonbi commented on pull request #816: LUCENE-10519: ThreadLocal.remove under G1GC takes 100% CPU

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
jaisonbi commented on PR #816: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/816#issuecomment-1109236031 This issue has no relationship with "creating and destroying too many threads", but it's caused by **too many "ThreadLocal" objects created from same threads**. Based on the implemen

[GitHub] [lucene] rmuir commented on pull request #816: LUCENE-10519: ThreadLocal.remove under G1GC takes 100% CPU

2022-04-25 Thread GitBox
rmuir commented on PR #816: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/816#issuecomment-1109349516 See this is my problem, applications using threadpools of absurd sizes (unbounded, 1, etc), and then blaming lucene for their GC woes. at this point the DSM-IV is needed, because developer

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-10535) The build fails in :checkUnusedConstraints (ConcurrentModificationException)

2022-04-25 Thread Dawid Weiss (Jira)
Dawid Weiss created LUCENE-10535: Summary: The build fails in :checkUnusedConstraints (ConcurrentModificationException) Key: LUCENE-10535 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10535 Projec

[jira] [Assigned] (LUCENE-10535) The build fails in :checkUnusedConstraints (ConcurrentModificationException)

2022-04-25 Thread Dawid Weiss (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dawid Weiss reassigned LUCENE-10535: Assignee: Dawid Weiss > The build fails in :checkUnusedConstraints (ConcurrentModificati

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10535) The build fails in :checkUnusedConstraints (ConcurrentModificationException)

2022-04-25 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17527923#comment-17527923 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10535: -- Co

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10535) The build fails in :checkUnusedConstraints (ConcurrentModificationException)

2022-04-25 Thread Dawid Weiss (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17527924#comment-17527924 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10535: -- Upgraded the plugin to 2.10.0 - the build

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-10535) The build fails in :checkUnusedConstraints (ConcurrentModificationException)

2022-04-25 Thread Dawid Weiss (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dawid Weiss resolved LUCENE-10535. -- Fix Version/s: 10.0 (main) Resolution: Fixed > The build fails in :checkUnusedConstrai