github-actions[bot] commented on PR #12996:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12996#issuecomment-1905061582
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your
HoustonPutman commented on PR #2682:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2682#issuecomment-1905034000
Given that I have yet to have a passing build, hopefully this helps!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
stefanvodita commented on PR #13028:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13028#issuecomment-1904887153
Thank you for finding this @msfroh! I pushed a commit that should fix the
issue.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
itygh commented on PR #2682:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2682#issuecomment-1904782055
这是来自QQ邮箱的假期自动回复邮件。您好，我最近正在休假中，无法亲自回复您的邮件。我将在假期结束后，尽快给您回复。
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
risdenk opened a new pull request, #2682:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2682
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14765
backports SOLR-14765 and follow up bug fix/test commits.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
msfroh commented on PR #13028:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13028#issuecomment-1904540802
Hey -- I was just telling a colleague about this change and he asked about
the synchronization on `initChildrenSiblings`. I talked through the logic in
`computeChildrenSiblings` and
stefanvodita commented on code in PR #13028:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13028#discussion_r1462177725
##
lucene/facet/src/test/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/directory/TestTaxonomyIndexArrays.java:
##
@@ -59,4 +64,22 @@ public void testMultiplesOfChunkSize() {
msfroh commented on code in PR #13028:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13028#discussion_r1462133413
##
lucene/facet/src/test/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/directory/TestTaxonomyIndexArrays.java:
##
@@ -59,4 +64,22 @@ public void testMultiplesOfChunkSize() {
benwtrent commented on PR #13027:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13027#issuecomment-1904325653
@jpountz, I gotcha, pushed a change
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
jpountz commented on PR #13027:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13027#issuecomment-1904218681
OK, taking an int in that method sounds fine to me. Can we still preserve
the signature of `mergeOneField` to return `void` and re-compute the doc count
before passing the doc count to
benwtrent commented on PR #13027:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13027#issuecomment-1904205095
> Adding an @Override to MergedVectorValues that asserts size() is never
called is a good protection idea.
Well, that would be overkill actually, many things use `size()` and
stefanvodita opened a new pull request, #13028:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13028
In #12995, we introduced `allocateChunkedArray`, but had a misaligned
assumption in the constructor for cases where the allocation size is 0. @msfroh
- sorry I missed this check when we
benwtrent commented on PR #13027:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13027#issuecomment-1904192755
@jpountz
> I see that it needs to linearly scan all vectors anyway, so this shouldn't
come at a performance penalty?
We would then need to linearly scan all the vectors
jpountz commented on PR #13027:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13027#issuecomment-1904174622
Good catch. I wonder what is the best place to compute size() correctly. I
see you fixed the merge instances, but this is not how it's done elsewhere, see
e.g. `FieldsConsumer#write`,
jpountz opened a new pull request, #13026:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13026
If the required clause doesn't contribute scores, which typically happens if
the required clause is a `FILTER` clause, then the minimum competitive score
can be propagated directly to the optional
jpountz commented on issue #12826:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12826#issuecomment-1903948450
Implemented!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
jpountz closed issue #12826: Move group-varint encoding/decoding logic to
DataOutput/DataInput?
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12826
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
jpountz closed issue #12005: Should we fail retrieving doc values on the wrong
type?
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12005
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
jpountz commented on issue #12456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12456#issuecomment-1903947480
Closing: the slowdown has been mostly mitigated through other changes.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
jpountz closed issue #12456: Investigate slow fuzzy queries
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12456
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe,
jpountz commented on issue #13022:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13022#issuecomment-1903944692
Is `findMerges()` a bottleck for your use-case?
FWIW, this way `TieredMergePolicy` works is a feature, it allows it to
greedily pack segments into merges in a way that allows
stefanvodita merged PR #13000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13000
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
stefanvodita closed issue #12989: Taxonomy facets: can we change massive
`int[]` for parent/child/sibling tree to paged/block `int[]` to reduce RAM
pressure?
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12989
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
stefanvodita merged PR #12995:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12995
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
easyice opened a new issue, #13025:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13025
### Description
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected.totalGroupedHitCount !=
actual.totalGroupedHitCount expected:<23> but was:<21>
> at
25 matches
Mail list logo
