github-actions[bot] commented on PR #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12842#issuecomment-2028507574
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
antonha commented on PR #13149:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13149#issuecomment-2028487168
Thank you all for helping to get this PR into a better state. The only thing
that still irked me is that I couldn't get the tests to execute all newly added
methods. I made a few changes
dweiss commented on issue #13240:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13240#issuecomment-2028479178
Thank you. I'll get back to this and will try to make it work again.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
rmuir commented on PR #13252:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13252#issuecomment-2028078833
This looks like a good improvement, these `Arrays` methods become much
faster than the home-written loops for longer arrays.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
rmuir commented on issue #13240:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13240#issuecomment-2028077665
I pushed
https://github.com/apache/lucene/commit/e2110e0b8e8a38d93c387db9d0d67fb4fe577181
for now. Enjoy your holidays, there's no urgency to this, I just didn't want
anyone else to
dweiss commented on issue #13240:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13240#issuecomment-2027965086
Could you leave this issue open for me but add a comment to the help file
for now, @rmuir ? I'll take another look at it but Easter holidays are quite
intense in this part of the wor
vsop-479 commented on PR #13253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13253#issuecomment-2027961416
@mikemccand
Do you think this change is feasible?
Though this change is still in progress, it would be nice to get your
opinion.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
vsop-479 opened a new pull request, #13253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13253
In `SegmentTermsEnum.seekExact` and `SegmentTermsEnumFrame.seekCeil`, if we
seek a less target after seeking a greater target, we set `nextEnt` to -1 in
`SegmentTermsEnumFrame.rewind`. Which result
