[GitHub] [lucene-solr] chenkovsky commented on issue #895: fix LUCENE-8985

2019-10-10 Thread GitBox
chenkovsky commented on issue #895: fix LUCENE-8985 URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/895#issuecomment-540876601 I have changed the code, and enabled the capture num test. now the capture behavior is same as the original implementation. actually no performance impact. ---

[GitHub] [lucene-solr] chenkovsky commented on issue #895: fix LUCENE-8985

2019-10-09 Thread GitBox
chenkovsky commented on issue #895: fix LUCENE-8985 URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/895#issuecomment-539922291 @janhoy I have submitted the code, and passed all testcases. A small difference compared to original implementation is that I will capture all tokens(original impl

[GitHub] [lucene-solr] chenkovsky commented on issue #895: fix LUCENE-8985

2019-10-07 Thread GitBox
chenkovsky commented on issue #895: fix LUCENE-8985 URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/895#issuecomment-539368862 @janhoy I have fixed the bug. but I cannot pass some test. I think some test cases are inconsistent. in test testBasicKeepOrigTwoOutputs, ` assertAnal

[GitHub] [lucene-solr] chenkovsky commented on issue #895: fix LUCENE-8985

2019-09-23 Thread GitBox
chenkovsky commented on issue #895: fix LUCENE-8985 URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/895#issuecomment-534363981 @janhoy yes. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] [lucene-solr] chenkovsky commented on issue #895: fix LUCENE-8985

2019-09-22 Thread GitBox
chenkovsky commented on issue #895: fix LUCENE-8985 URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/895#issuecomment-533858548 wait a minute, I add more testcases. It seems my patch is not correct now. This is an automated mes