[GitHub] [lucene-solr] jtibshirani commented on pull request #1671: LUCENE-9427: Ensure unified highlighter considers all terms in fuzzy query.

2020-08-03 Thread GitBox
jtibshirani commented on pull request #1671: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1671#issuecomment-668115301 I just pushed a changelog update. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond

[GitHub] [lucene-solr] jtibshirani commented on pull request #1671: LUCENE-9427: Ensure unified highlighter considers all terms in fuzzy query.

2020-07-21 Thread GitBox
jtibshirani commented on pull request #1671: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1671#issuecomment-661988556 Thanks @romseygeek for taking a look. What do you see as the next steps? Would it make sense to merge this, and I could look into LUCENE-9277 in a follow-up?

[GitHub] [lucene-solr] jtibshirani commented on pull request #1671: [LUCENE-9427] Ensure unified highlighter considers all terms in fuzzy query.

2020-07-14 Thread GitBox
jtibshirani commented on pull request #1671: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1671#issuecomment-658324084 It looks like this behavior changed during the `QueryVisitor` refactor: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/581/files#diff-449ea2758bc22783ca3f819096e1b638R97.