[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Tomoko Uchida resolved LUCENE-10493. ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 10.0 (main) Assignee: Tomoko Uchida Resolution: Fixed > Can we unify the viterbi search logic in the tokenizers of kuromoji and nori? > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-10493 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10493 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: modules/analysis > Reporter: Tomoko Uchida > Assignee: Tomoko Uchida > Priority: Major > Fix For: 10.0 (main) > > Time Spent: 4h 20m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > We now have common dictionary interfaces for kuromoji and nori > ([LUCENE-10393]). A natural question would be: is it possible to unify the > Japanese/Korean tokenizers? > The core methods of the two tokenizers are `parse()` and `backtrace()` to > calculate the minimum cost path by Viterbi search. I'd set the goal of this > issue to factoring out them into a separate class (in analysis-common) that > is shared between JapaneseTokenizer and KoreanTokenizer. > The algorithm to solve the minimum cost path itself is of course > language-agnostic, so I think it should be theoretically possible; the most > difficult part here might be the N-best path calculation - which is supported > only by JapaneseTokenizer and not by KoreanTokenizer. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org