[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Woodward updated LUCENE-9005:
----------------------------------
Attachment: LUCENE-9005.patch
> BooleanQuery.visit() incorrectly pulls subvisitors from its parent
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9005
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9005
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Alan Woodward
> Assignee: Alan Woodward
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: LUCENE-9005.patch
>
>
> BooleanQuery.visit() calls getSubVisitor once for each of its clause sets;
> however, this sub visitor is called on the passed-in visitor, which means
> that sub clauses get attached to its parent, rather than a visitor for that
> particular BQ.
> To illustrate, consider the following nested BooleanQuery: ("a b" (+c +d %e
> f)); we have a top-level disjunction query containing one phrase query
> (essentially a conjunction), and one boolean query containing both MUST,
> FILTER and SHOULD clauses. When visiting, the top level query will pull a
> SHOULD subvisitor, and pass both queries into it. The phrase query will pull
> a MUST subvisitor and all its two terms. The nested boolean will pull a
> MUST, and FILTER and a SHOULD; but these are all attached to the parent
> SHOULD visitor - in particular, the MUST and FILTER clauses will end up being
> attached to this SHOULD visitor, and be mis-interpreted as a disjunction.
> To fix this, BQ should first pull a MUST visitor and visit its MUST clauses
> using this visitor; SHOULD, FILTER and MUST_NOT clauses should then be pulled
> from this top-level MUST visitor.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
