[GitHub] [lucene] jpountz commented on pull request #101: LUCENE-9335: [Discussion Only] Add BMM scorer and use it for pure disjunction term query

jpountz commented on pull request #101: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/101#issuecomment-841124271 > in the jira ticket you had suggested to use BMM for top-level (flat?) boolean query only. Do you think this will need to be fixed? I opened this JIRA ticket because it

[GitHub] [lucene] jpountz commented on pull request #101: LUCENE-9335: [Discussion Only] Add BMM scorer and use it for pure disjunction term query

jpountz commented on pull request #101: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/101#issuecomment-837909869 Actually you don't need nightlyBench.py, you can use the standard python script. I think the following should work to test out on larger documents: - Download

[GitHub] [lucene] jpountz commented on pull request #101: LUCENE-9335: [Discussion Only] Add BMM scorer and use it for pure disjunction term query

jpountz commented on pull request #101: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/101#issuecomment-836880288 Wonderful, thanks @mikemccand ! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the

[GitHub] [lucene] jpountz commented on pull request #101: LUCENE-9335: [Discussion Only] Add BMM scorer and use it for pure disjunction term query

jpountz commented on pull request #101: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/101#issuecomment-836811596 @mikemccand I'll try to do it overnight as I have a terrible uplink. FWIW the file I have locally is `enwiki-20130102-lines.txt`, not the

[GitHub] [lucene] jpountz commented on pull request #101: LUCENE-9335: [Discussion Only] Add BMM scorer and use it for pure disjunction term query

jpountz commented on pull request #101: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/101#issuecomment-836296845 > I cherry-picked your commit and pushed to this branch / PR to further explore the changes and their effect, hope that's ok. Of course! > I also tried to run

[GitHub] [lucene] jpountz commented on pull request #101: LUCENE-9335: [Discussion Only] Add BMM scorer and use it for pure disjunction term query

jpountz commented on pull request #101: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/101#issuecomment-834791219 > The last two are optimization techniques not mentioned in the paper I think? To be honest I didn't read the paper recently so it's possible I diverged a bit from it.