[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6090) CI friendly properties break submodule builds

2017-10-19 Thread Jon Wilmoth (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16211904#comment-16211904 ] Jon Wilmoth commented on MNG-6090: -- Adding the flatten-maven-plugin to the parent pom did a

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6090) CI friendly properties break submodule builds

2017-10-19 Thread Jon Wilmoth (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16211898#comment-16211898 ] Jon Wilmoth commented on MNG-6090: -- FYI - I still see this broken behavior in 3.5.0 (i.e. c

[jira] [Updated] (MDEP-587) test-jar type is incorrectly translated to jar artifact when resolving dependencies

2017-10-19 Thread Michael O'Connor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MDEP-587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael O'Connor updated MDEP-587: -- Affects Version/s: 3.0.0 3.0.1 > test-jar type is incorrectly translated to

[jira] [Created] (MDEP-587) test-jar type is incorrectly translated to jar artifact when resolving dependencies

2017-10-19 Thread Michael O'Connor (JIRA)
Michael O'Connor created MDEP-587: - Summary: test-jar type is incorrectly translated to jar artifact when resolving dependencies Key: MDEP-587 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MDEP-587 Proje

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

2017-10-19 Thread Julian Reschke (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16211054#comment-16211054 ] Julian Reschke commented on SUREFIRE-1424: -- FWIW, I've for now worked around t

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

2017-10-19 Thread Julian Reschke (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16210879#comment-16210879 ] Julian Reschke commented on SUREFIRE-1424: -- I think the magic to include --add

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

2017-10-19 Thread Alan Bateman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16210846#comment-16210846 ] Alan Bateman edited comment on SUREFIRE-1424 at 10/19/17 10:27 AM: --

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

2017-10-19 Thread Alan Bateman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16210846#comment-16210846 ] Alan Bateman edited comment on SUREFIRE-1424 at 10/19/17 10:27 AM: --

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

2017-10-19 Thread Alan Bateman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16210846#comment-16210846 ] Alan Bateman edited comment on SUREFIRE-1424 at 10/19/17 10:26 AM: --

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

2017-10-19 Thread Alan Bateman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16210846#comment-16210846 ] Alan Bateman commented on SUREFIRE-1424: It's the same issue. If you run with `

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

2017-10-19 Thread Julian Reschke (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16210827#comment-16210827 ] Julian Reschke commented on SUREFIRE-1424: -- Note there's a similar problem wit