[jira] [Commented] (MSHARED-843) Provide artifacts in CollectorResult when collectDependencies

2019-11-13 Thread Pim Moerenhout (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973782#comment-16973782 ] Pim Moerenhout commented on MSHARED-843: So, the dependency plugin just supplies

[GitHub] [maven-apache-parent] ctubbsii commented on issue #1: Add pluginRepositories section for SNAPSHOTs

2019-11-13 Thread GitBox
ctubbsii commented on issue #1: Add pluginRepositories section for SNAPSHOTs URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-apache-parent/pull/1#issuecomment-553613812 Thanks for merging this! This is an automated message from the Apach

[jira] [Commented] (MSHARED-843) Provide artifacts in CollectorResult when collectDependencies

2019-11-13 Thread Robert Scholte (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973692#comment-16973692 ] Robert Scholte commented on MSHARED-843: No, I'm actually thinking about removin

[GitHub] [maven-surefire] Tibor17 commented on issue #254: Surefire 1695 - implement reviewer comments

2019-11-13 Thread GitBox
Tibor17 commented on issue #254: Surefire 1695 - implement reviewer comments URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/254#issuecomment-553601245 @IoannisDermitzakis @YiannisDermitzakis You have old starting point commit? We have applied the checkstyle to tests as well.

[GitHub] [maven-surefire] YiannisDermitzakis closed pull request #254: Surefire 1695 - implement reviewer comments

2019-11-13 Thread GitBox
YiannisDermitzakis closed pull request #254: Surefire 1695 - implement reviewer comments URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/254 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the mess

[GitHub] [maven-surefire] YiannisDermitzakis opened a new pull request #254: Surefire 1695 - implement reviewer comments

2019-11-13 Thread GitBox
YiannisDermitzakis opened a new pull request #254: Surefire 1695 - implement reviewer comments URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/254 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to th

[jira] [Commented] (MSHARED-843) Provide artifacts in CollectorResult when collectDependencies

2019-11-13 Thread Pim Moerenhout (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973666#comment-16973666 ] Pim Moerenhout commented on MSHARED-843: Should the existing interface List getR

[jira] [Commented] (MSHARED-843) Provide artifacts in CollectorResult when collectDependencies

2019-11-13 Thread Robert Scholte (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973645#comment-16973645 ] Robert Scholte commented on MSHARED-843: The collector-result is intended to ret

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6801) MavenXpp3Writer doesn't retain structure

2019-11-13 Thread Robert Scholte (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973638#comment-16973638 ] Robert Scholte commented on MNG-6801: - Hi [~liana.lupsa1], thank you for choosing Apach

[jira] [Created] (MSHARED-843) Provide artifacts in CollectorResult when collectDependencies

2019-11-13 Thread Pim Moerenhout (Jira)
Pim Moerenhout created MSHARED-843: -- Summary: Provide artifacts in CollectorResult when collectDependencies Key: MSHARED-843 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-843 Project: Maven Sha

[jira] [Commented] (MWAR-353) Manifest still not written to exploded location

2019-11-13 Thread Robert Scholte (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MWAR-353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973603#comment-16973603 ] Robert Scholte commented on MWAR-353: - [~jbochenski] I've tried to explain why the mani

[GitHub] [maven-antrun-plugin] shivajithanneeru commented on issue #1: MANTRUN-221 Fails to pass maven properties set in user properties only

2019-11-13 Thread GitBox
shivajithanneeru commented on issue #1: MANTRUN-221 Fails to pass maven properties set in user properties only URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-antrun-plugin/pull/1#issuecomment-553545290 Hi @ASzc @jvanzyl @olamy , Can someone please merge the PR to the master and release new versio

[jira] [Updated] (SUREFIRE-1699) Skip Rerun when failures are due to Assertion Error

2019-11-13 Thread Tibor Digana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-1699: --- Fix Version/s: Backlog > Skip Rerun when failures are due to Assertion Error > ---

[jira] [Closed] (SUREFIRE-1698) Parameter "skipAfterFailureCount" no working

2019-11-13 Thread Tibor Digana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tibor Digana closed SUREFIRE-1698. -- Assignee: Tibor Digana Resolution: Duplicate > Parameter "skipAfterFailureCount" no wo

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1631) Forked VM terminated without properly saying goodbye with AciveMQ on Windows10 and MinTTY(Cygwin) console

2019-11-13 Thread Tibor Digana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973561#comment-16973561 ] Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-1631: Yes, exactly as you said. Users have

[GitHub] [maven-surefire] Tibor17 edited a comment on issue #252: [SUREFIRE-1711] Support @ParameterizedTest for JUnit 5 test reruns

2019-11-13 Thread GitBox
Tibor17 edited a comment on issue #252: [SUREFIRE-1711] Support @ParameterizedTest for JUnit 5 test reruns URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/252#issuecomment-553403097 @Micky002 I did not mention this because simply parallelism is not fixed. It is non-trivial issue whi

[jira] [Commented] (MWAR-353) Manifest still not written to exploded location

2019-11-13 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MWAR-353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973544#comment-16973544 ] Karl Heinz Marbaise commented on MWAR-353: -- [~jbochenski] Have you taking a look i

[jira] [Commented] (MWAR-353) Manifest still not written to exploded location

2019-11-13 Thread Jakub Bochenski (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MWAR-353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973474#comment-16973474 ] Jakub Bochenski commented on MWAR-353: -- [~rfscholte] I'm not sure if you are respondin

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1718) running build and test separately with surefire

2019-11-13 Thread Tibor Digana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973403#comment-16973403 ] Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-1718: Pls subscribe to the user mailing lis

[jira] [Closed] (SUREFIRE-1718) running build and test separately with surefire

2019-11-13 Thread Tibor Digana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tibor Digana closed SUREFIRE-1718. -- Resolution: Not A Bug > running build and test separately with surefire >

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1718) running build and test separately with surefire

2019-11-13 Thread Tibor Digana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973397#comment-16973397 ] Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-1718: You are mixing the terminologies. Sur

[jira] [Assigned] (SUREFIRE-1718) running build and test separately with surefire

2019-11-13 Thread Tibor Digana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tibor Digana reassigned SUREFIRE-1718: -- Assignee: Tibor Digana > running build and test separately with surefire > --

[GitHub] [maven-surefire] Micky002 commented on issue #252: [SUREFIRE-1711] Support @ParameterizedTest for JUnit 5 test reruns

2019-11-13 Thread GitBox
Micky002 commented on issue #252: [SUREFIRE-1711] Support @ParameterizedTest for JUnit 5 test reruns URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/252#issuecomment-553405088 Sry i just found the roadmap and saw that exactly this will be done in M5. Thanks for the info :) --

[GitHub] [maven-surefire] Tibor17 commented on issue #252: [SUREFIRE-1711] Support @ParameterizedTest for JUnit 5 test reruns

2019-11-13 Thread GitBox
Tibor17 commented on issue #252: [SUREFIRE-1711] Support @ParameterizedTest for JUnit 5 test reruns URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/252#issuecomment-553403097 @Micky002 I did not mention this because simply parallelism is not fixed. It is non-trivial issue which is a

[jira] [Updated] (SUREFIRE-1718) running build and test separately with surefire

2019-11-13 Thread Abhishek (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Abhishek updated SUREFIRE-1718: --- Issue Type: New Feature (was: Wish) > running build and test separately with surefire > ---

[GitHub] [maven-surefire] Micky002 commented on issue #252: [SUREFIRE-1711] Support @ParameterizedTest for JUnit 5 test reruns

2019-11-13 Thread GitBox
Micky002 commented on issue #252: [SUREFIRE-1711] Support @ParameterizedTest for JUnit 5 test reruns URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/252#issuecomment-553401298 I have tested the new rerun feature with parameterized tests. It generally looks good but there is a problem wi

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1631) Forked VM terminated without properly saying goodbye with AciveMQ on Windows10 and MinTTY(Cygwin) console

2019-11-13 Thread Adolfo Cia (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973332#comment-16973332 ] Adolfo Cia commented on SUREFIRE-1631: -- How does it work ? I simply reply with +1

[GitHub] [maven-surefire] Tibor17 commented on issue #252: [SUREFIRE-1711] Support @ParameterizedTest for JUnit 5 test reruns

2019-11-13 Thread GitBox
Tibor17 commented on issue #252: [SUREFIRE-1711] Support @ParameterizedTest for JUnit 5 test reruns URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/252#issuecomment-553395200 @Col-E no problem. You are always welcome. @Col-E @jon-bell hey guys, we started the release V

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1631) Forked VM terminated without properly saying goodbye with AciveMQ on Windows10 and MinTTY(Cygwin) console

2019-11-13 Thread Tibor Digana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973324#comment-16973324 ] Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-1631: On my Windows 10 the default console

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1631) Forked VM terminated without properly saying goodbye with AciveMQ on Windows10 and MinTTY(Cygwin) console

2019-11-13 Thread Adolfo Cia (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973308#comment-16973308 ] Adolfo Cia commented on SUREFIRE-1631: -- Do you know which consoles/OS don't have

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-5612) effective pom should not contain file-based profile activation fully interpolated but with limited interpolation like seen during profile activation

2019-11-13 Thread Stefan Cordes (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973262#comment-16973262 ] Stefan Cordes commented on MNG-5612: Hi Hervé, {{this change lets}} {noformat} mvn fla

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6802) FileProfileActivator changes FileProfileActivator.exists which lets flattened resolveCiFriendliesOnly depending fail activating profile

2019-11-13 Thread Stefan Cordes (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973255#comment-16973255 ] Stefan Cordes commented on MNG-6802: {noformat} // replace activation value with interp

[jira] [Comment Edited] (MNG-6802) FileProfileActivator changes FileProfileActivator.exists which lets flattened resolveCiFriendliesOnly depending fail activating profile

2019-11-13 Thread Stefan Cordes (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973234#comment-16973234 ] Stefan Cordes edited comment on MNG-6802 at 11/13/19 10:54 AM: --

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6802) FileProfileActivator changes FileProfileActivator.exists which lets flattened resolveCiFriendliesOnly depending fail activating profile

2019-11-13 Thread Stefan Cordes (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973234#comment-16973234 ] Stefan Cordes commented on MNG-6802: See example pom.xml here: [https://bitbucket.org/

[jira] [Created] (MNG-6802) FileProfileActivator changes FileProfileActivator.exists which lets flattened resolveCiFriendliesOnly depending fail activating profile

2019-11-13 Thread Stefan Cordes (Jira)
Stefan Cordes created MNG-6802: -- Summary: FileProfileActivator changes FileProfileActivator.exists which lets flattened resolveCiFriendliesOnly depending fail activating profile Key: MNG-6802 URL: https://issues.apac

[jira] [Comment Edited] (MNG-6801) MavenXpp3Writer doesn't retain structure

2019-11-13 Thread Liana Lupsa (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973210#comment-16973210 ] Liana Lupsa edited comment on MNG-6801 at 11/13/19 10:10 AM: - W

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6801) MavenXpp3Writer doesn't retain structure

2019-11-13 Thread Liana Lupsa (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973210#comment-16973210 ] Liana Lupsa commented on MNG-6801: -- Well I do think it's a bug because the output is not c

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (MNG-6801) MavenXpp3Writer doesn't retain structure

2019-11-13 Thread Liana Lupsa (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Liana Lupsa updated MNG-6801: - Comment: was deleted (was: [~Mikael Åsberg] I agree with you ! ) > MavenXpp3Writer doesn't retain structur

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6801) MavenXpp3Writer doesn't retain structure

2019-11-13 Thread Liana Lupsa (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973199#comment-16973199 ] Liana Lupsa commented on MNG-6801: -- [~Mikael Åsberg] I agree with you !  > MavenXpp3Write

[jira] [Created] (SUREFIRE-1718) running build and test separately with surefire

2019-11-13 Thread Abhishek (Jira)
Abhishek created SUREFIRE-1718: -- Summary: running build and test separately with surefire Key: SUREFIRE-1718 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1718 Project: Maven Surefire Is

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6801) MavenXpp3Writer doesn't retain structure

2019-11-13 Thread Jira
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973123#comment-16973123 ] Mikael Åsberg commented on MNG-6801: Why not change implementation to use a  LinkedHash