[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=360616#comment-360616
]
Aslak Knutsen commented on SUREFIRE-762:
dependenciesToScan helps some, but different use
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=360606#comment-360606
]
Aslak Knutsen commented on SUREFIRE-762:
Yes, this is still relevant.
Different depende
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=324507#comment-324507
]
Aslak Knutsen commented on SUREFIRE-569:
I wanted to specify which artifacts to scan basi
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aslak Knutsen updated SUREFIRE-762:
---
Attachment: SUREFIRE-762
Git Commit:
https://github.com/aslakknutsen/maven-surefire/commit/e914
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=317237#comment-317237
]
Aslak Knutsen commented on SUREFIRE-569:
Yea, assumed it was for legal reasons. You need
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=317234#comment-317234
]
Aslak Knutsen commented on SUREFIRE-569:
I attempted to change as little existing code as
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aslak Knutsen updated SUREFIRE-569:
---
Attachment: SUREFIRE-569.patch
git diff attached. Need some other format?
I'm not going to argu
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=317229#comment-317229
]
Aslak Knutsen commented on SUREFIRE-569:
I have a fix for this here:
https://github.com/
Add support for test compile and test runtime separation
Key: SUREFIRE-762
URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-762
Project: Maven Surefire
Issue Type: New Feature
Other registered failing RunListeners cause NullPointerException in
ConcurrentReporterManager, falsely report of "No tests were executed!":
NullPointerException in ConcurrentReporterManager, falsely report of "No tests
were executed!"
--
Key: SUREFIRE-744
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-744
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aslak Knutsen updated SUREFIRE-744:
---
Attachment: MavenSurefireJUnit47RunnerTestCase.java
TestCase showing the issue
> NullPointerExce
JUnit 4.x provider never calls notifier.testRunFinished
---
Key: SUREFIRE-743
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-743
Project: Maven Surefire
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aslak Knutsen updated SUREFIRE-629:
---
Attachment: MavenSurefireJUnit47RunnerTestCase.java
Updated test case to expose same issue in 2.6
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=229258#action_229258
]
Aslak Knutsen commented on SUREFIRE-629:
The rework suffer from the same issue it seems, on
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aslak Knutsen updated SUREFIRE-629:
---
Attachment: MavenSurefireJUnit47RunnerTestCase.java
Test case exposing Listener assumption bug.
NullPointerException in DemultiplexingRunListener, falsely report of "No tests
were executed!"
--
Key: SUREFIRE-629
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-629
17 matches
Mail list logo