[jira] [Created] (MWAR-405) Workaround XStream incompatibility with Java9

Enrico Olivelli created MWAR-405: Summary: Workaround XStream incompatibility with Java9 Key: MWAR-405 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MWAR-405 Project: Maven WAR Plugin Issue Type

[jira] [Commented] (MWAR-405) Workaround XStream incompatibility with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MWAR-405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15966340#comment-15966340 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on MWAR-405: -- I can clean up the list and complete the patch.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (MWAR-405) Workaround XStream incompatibility with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MWAR-405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15966340#comment-15966340 ] Enrico Olivelli edited comment on MWAR-405 at 4/13/17 1:55 AM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (MWAR-405) Workaround XStream incompatibility with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MWAR-405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15967000#comment-15967000 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on MWAR-405: -- I have updated the patch, listing only the used

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1265) reuseForks=false fails on jdk-9-ea builds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15993099#comment-15993099 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1265: --- I am trying current trunk but I

[jira] [Updated] (SUREFIRE-1265) reuseForks=false fails on jdk-9-ea builds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Enrico Olivelli updated SUREFIRE-1265: -- Attachment: Java9Example.zip Attaching a a simple reproducer, Just use javax.ws.Holde

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1265) reuseForks=false fails on jdk-9-ea builds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15994439#comment-15994439 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1265: --- I have checked out your last com

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1265) reuseForks=false fails on jdk-9-ea builds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15994440#comment-15994440 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1265: --- Im trying to add the test case t

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1265) reuseForks=false fails on jdk-9-ea builds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15994486#comment-15994486 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1265: --- Thank you [~tibor17] Is the test

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1265) reuseForks=false fails on jdk-9-ea builds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15994592#comment-15994592 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1265: --- I'm really sorry Acutally I ha

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SUREFIRE-1265) reuseForks=false fails on jdk-9-ea builds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15994592#comment-15994592 ] Enrico Olivelli edited comment on SUREFIRE-1265 at 5/3/17 11:33 AM: -

[jira] [Created] (MJAVADOC-480) Javadoc generation broken on Java9 if there are references to javax.xml.bind.annontation.XmlElement and building code for java8

Enrico Olivelli created MJAVADOC-480: Summary: Javadoc generation broken on Java9 if there are references to javax.xml.bind.annontation.XmlElement and building code for java8 Key: MJAVADOC-480 URL: https://iss

[jira] [Commented] (MJAVADOC-480) Javadoc generation broken on Java9 if there are references to javax.xml.bind.annontation.XmlElement and building code for java8

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16000391#comment-16000391 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on MJAVADOC-480: -- [~rfscholte] I confirm that with {

[jira] [Commented] (MJAVADOC-480) Javadoc generation broken on Java9 if there are references to javax.xml.bind.annontation.XmlElement and building code for java8

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16008106#comment-16008106 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on MJAVADOC-480: -- [~rfscholte] your example works gre

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1403) [Jigsaw] [Java 9] add "--add-modules ALL-SYSTEM" to forked CLI argument

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16117338#comment-16117338 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1403: --- Happy to see you are moving forw

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1403) [Jigsaw] [Java 9] add "--add-modules ALL-SYSTEM" to forked CLI argument

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16135089#comment-16135089 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1403: --- Great. Thank you +1 LGTM > [Jig

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16185477#comment-16185477 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1424: --- Robert, Tibor, I agree with Robe

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16185556#comment-16185556 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1424: --- >From the point of view of a

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16213850#comment-16213850 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1424: --- IMHO we have two options: 1) Ad

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16213913#comment-16213913 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1424: --- +1 for dropping -add-modules jav

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16213964#comment-16213964 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1424: --- [~tibor17] I will be happy to he

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16214045#comment-16214045 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1424: --- IMO we can drop the trick and ad

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16214096#comment-16214096 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1424: --- Ok let's wait, there is no hurry

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16217701#comment-16217701 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1424: --- I think that Alan's answer is co

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16220270#comment-16220270 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1424: --- [~krzyk] you should simply add -

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16220270#comment-16220270 ] Enrico Olivelli edited comment on SUREFIRE-1424 at 10/26/17 10:14 AM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16220300#comment-16220300 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1424: --- are you using forkCount > 1 ? yo

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16220399#comment-16220399 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1424: --- [~tibor17] As you can see I am p

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16220399#comment-16220399 ] Enrico Olivelli edited comment on SUREFIRE-1424 at 10/26/17 1:04 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16222149#comment-16222149 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1424: --- [~tibor17] [~rfscholte] I have u

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16222152#comment-16222152 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1424: --- Actually the command line to mak

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16224428#comment-16224428 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1424: --- Tibor, I think we have to give t

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16224628#comment-16224628 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1424: --- [~tibor17] I mean https://github

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16224630#comment-16224630 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1424: --- [~tibor17] I agree that we shoul

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1403) [Jigsaw] [Java 9] add "--add-modules java.se.ee" to forked CLI argument

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16289207#comment-16289207 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1403: --- This has already been fixed on m

[jira] [Created] (SUREFIRE-1453) Allow to specify non existant classes as "groups"

Enrico Olivelli created SUREFIRE-1453: - Summary: Allow to specify non existant classes as "groups" Key: SUREFIRE-1453 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1453 Project: Maven Surefir

[jira] [Updated] (SUREFIRE-1453) Allow to specify non existant classes as "groups"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Enrico Olivelli updated SUREFIRE-1453: -- Priority: Critical (was: Major) > Allow to specify non existant classes as "groups"

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1453) Allow to specify non existant classes as "groups"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16290716#comment-16290716 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1453: --- [~tibor17] does this sound reaso

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1453) Allow to specify non existant classes as "groups"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16290719#comment-16290719 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1453: --- This thread is relevant to this

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1453) Allow to specify non existant classes as "groups"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16292093#comment-16292093 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1453: --- I will try to send my proposal t

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1453) Allow to specify non existant classes as "groups"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16292165#comment-16292165 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1453: --- I think that additional it tests

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1453) Allow to specify non existant classes as "groups"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16292204#comment-16292204 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1453: --- [~tibor17] patch is ready and wo

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1453) Allow to specify non existant classes as "groups"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16293184#comment-16293184 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1453: --- Sure tests are all passing, I di

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1453) Allow to specify non existant classes as "groups"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16293187#comment-16293187 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1453: --- Or are you telling that I have t

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1403) [Jigsaw] [Java 9] add "--add-modules java.se.ee" to forked CLI argument

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16303341#comment-16303341 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1403: --- David, please see comments above

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1450) TestNG Listener aren't working from Property Tag in POM.xml With JDK9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16323134#comment-16323134 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1450: --- I will check out the poc and mak

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1450) TestNG Listener aren't working from Property Tag in POM.xml With JDK9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16325594#comment-16325594 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1450: --- After debugging for an hour on t

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1463) integration tests should run on the top of JDK 9

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16325657#comment-16325657 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on SUREFIRE-1463: --- Great work, I see that most of t