[jira] [Created] (MCOMPILER-547) NPE when --patch-module is used in non-module project

2023-09-22 Thread Robert Varga (Jira)
Robert Varga created MCOMPILER-547: -- Summary: NPE when --patch-module is used in non-module project Key: MCOMPILER-547 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MCOMPILER-547 Project: Maven Compiler

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1820) Using SurefireForkNodeFactory with JDK8 results in NoSuchMethodError

2020-07-17 Thread Robert Varga (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17160197#comment-17160197 ] Robert Varga commented on SUREFIRE-1820: Ah, sorry, --release takes a different argument than

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1820) Using SurefireForkNodeFactory with JDK8 results in NoSuchMethodError

2020-07-17 Thread Robert Varga (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17160196#comment-17160196 ] Robert Varga commented on SUREFIRE-1820: Yeah, for JDK11 targeting 1.7 is way too old:

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1820) Using SurefireForkNodeFactory with JDK8 results in NoSuchMethodError

2020-07-17 Thread Robert Varga (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17160167#comment-17160167 ] Robert Varga commented on SUREFIRE-1820: Yes, exactly – if the project is being built JDK is

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1820) Using SurefireForkNodeFactory with JDK8 results in NoSuchMethodError

2020-07-14 Thread Robert Varga (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17157199#comment-17157199 ] Robert Varga commented on SUREFIRE-1820: Specifically this comment:

[jira] [Updated] (SUREFIRE-1820) Using SurefireForkNodeFactory with JDK8 results in NoSuchMethodError

2020-07-14 Thread Robert Varga (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Varga updated SUREFIRE-1820: --- Description: Attempting to use TCP channels for communication with JDK 1.8 results in the

[jira] [Updated] (SUREFIRE-1820) Using SurefireForkNodeFactory with JDK8 results in NoSuchMethodError

2020-07-14 Thread Robert Varga (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Varga updated SUREFIRE-1820: --- Issue Type: Bug (was: Dependency upgrade) > Using SurefireForkNodeFactory with JDK8

[jira] [Updated] (SUREFIRE-1820) Using SurefireForkNodeFactory with JDK8 results in NoSuchMethodError

2020-07-14 Thread Robert Varga (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Varga updated SUREFIRE-1820: --- Description: Attempting to use > Using SurefireForkNodeFactory with JDK8 results in

[jira] [Updated] (SUREFIRE-1820) Using SurefireForkNodeFactory with JDK8 results in NoSuchMethodError

2020-07-14 Thread Robert Varga (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Varga updated SUREFIRE-1820: --- Component/s: process forking > Using SurefireForkNodeFactory with JDK8 results in

[jira] [Updated] (SUREFIRE-1820) Using SurefireForkNodeFactory with JDK8 results in NoSuchMethodError

2020-07-14 Thread Robert Varga (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Varga updated SUREFIRE-1820: --- Affects Version/s: 3.0.0-M5 > Using SurefireForkNodeFactory with JDK8 results in

[jira] [Updated] (SUREFIRE-1820) Using SurefireForkNodeFactory with JDK8 results in NoSuchMethodError

2020-07-14 Thread Robert Varga (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Varga updated SUREFIRE-1820: --- Summary: Using SurefireForkNodeFactory with JDK8 results in NoSuchMethodError (was:

[jira] [Created] (SUREFIRE-1820) Using TCP SurefireForkNodeFactory

2020-07-14 Thread Robert Varga (Jira)
Robert Varga created SUREFIRE-1820: -- Summary: Using TCP SurefireForkNodeFactory Key: SUREFIRE-1820 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1820 Project: Maven Surefire Issue

[jira] [Updated] (MJAVADOC-649) javadoc:aggregate mis-determines whether a submodule was skipped

2020-04-08 Thread Robert Varga (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Varga updated MJAVADOC-649: -- Description: The fix for MJAVADOC-613 ends up mis-detecting when a submodule is being

[jira] [Updated] (MJAVADOC-649) javadoc:aggregate mis-determines whether a submodule was skipped

2020-04-08 Thread Robert Varga (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Varga updated MJAVADOC-649: -- External issue URL: https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/ODLPARENT-229 > javadoc:aggregate

[jira] [Created] (MJAVADOC-649) javadoc:aggregate mis-determines whether a submodule was skipped

2020-04-08 Thread Robert Varga (Jira)
Robert Varga created MJAVADOC-649: - Summary: javadoc:aggregate mis-determines whether a submodule was skipped Key: MJAVADOC-649 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-649 Project: Maven

[jira] [Commented] (MJAVADOC-591) javadoc fails with maven.compiler.release=8 and Automatic-Module-Name

2019-04-13 Thread Robert Varga (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16816961#comment-16816961 ] Robert Varga commented on MJAVADOC-591: --- Yes, I noticed that property. I agree, that was just the

[jira] [Commented] (MJAVADOC-591) javadoc fails with maven.compiler.release=8 and Automatic-Module-Name

2019-04-13 Thread Robert Varga (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16816940#comment-16816940 ] Robert Varga commented on MJAVADOC-591: --- Ah, right, it was just my local repo that got a

[jira] [Commented] (MJAVADOC-591) javadoc fails with maven.compiler.release=8 and Automatic-Module-Name

2019-04-13 Thread Robert Varga (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16816925#comment-16816925 ] Robert Varga commented on MJAVADOC-591: --- It seems to work with 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT. > javadoc fails

[jira] [Commented] (MJAVADOC-591) javadoc fails with maven.compiler.release=8 and Automatic-Module-Name

2019-04-11 Thread Robert Varga (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16815912#comment-16815912 ] Robert Varga commented on MJAVADOC-591: --- Since maven.compiler.release overrides

[jira] [Updated] (MJAVADOC-591) javadoc fails with maven.compiler.release=8 and Automatic-Module-Name

2019-03-26 Thread Robert Varga (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Varga updated MJAVADOC-591: -- Description: In a module, which defines an Automatic-Module-Name and (inherits)

[jira] [Created] (MJAVADOC-591) javadoc fails with maven.compiler.release=8 and Automatic-Module-Name

2019-03-26 Thread Robert Varga (JIRA)
Robert Varga created MJAVADOC-591: - Summary: javadoc fails with maven.compiler.release=8 and Automatic-Module-Name Key: MJAVADOC-591 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-591 Project:

[jira] [Comment Edited] (MRESOLVER-42) DefaultArtifact(String) is inefficient

2018-02-11 Thread Robert Varga (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-42?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16360161#comment-16360161 ] Robert Varga edited comment on MRESOLVER-42 at 2/11/18 11:09 PM: - Fix at

[jira] [Comment Edited] (MRESOLVER-42) DefaultArtifact(String) is inefficient

2018-02-11 Thread Robert Varga (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-42?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16360161#comment-16360161 ] Robert Varga edited comment on MRESOLVER-42 at 2/11/18 11:08 PM: - Fix at

[jira] [Commented] (MRESOLVER-42) DefaultArtifact(String) is inefficient

2018-02-11 Thread Robert Varga (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-42?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16360161#comment-16360161 ] Robert Varga commented on MRESOLVER-42: --- Fix at

[jira] [Created] (MRESOLVER-42) DefaultArtifact(String) is inefficient

2018-02-11 Thread Robert Varga (JIRA)
Robert Varga created MRESOLVER-42: - Summary: DefaultArtifact(String) is inefficient Key: MRESOLVER-42 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-42 Project: Maven Resolver Issue

[jira] Commented: (MCOMPILER-75) Add apt support for Java 6

2010-03-28 Thread Robert Varga (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOMPILER-75?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=215840#action_215840 ] Robert Varga commented on MCOMPILER-75: --- The proper implementation of -processorpath is

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (MCOMPILER-75) Add apt support for Java 6

2010-03-28 Thread Robert Varga (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOMPILER-75?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=215840#action_215840 ] Robert Varga edited comment on MCOMPILER-75 at 3/28/10 8:09 PM: The