michael-o commented on pull request #427:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/427#issuecomment-1006815704
@jmax01 `${pom.parent.version}` also needs to be added. Also rebase and
reconcile the conflict. Targetting for 3.8.5.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servic
michael-o commented on pull request #427:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/427#issuecomment-1003094540
Just tried `${pom.version}` with `help:evaluate`, this must be also tested.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
michael-o commented on pull request #427:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/427#issuecomment-1001991812
As far as I understand this PR it slightly relaxes the expression to a
disallowed minimum. What about pom.version?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
michael-o commented on pull request #427:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/427#issuecomment-1001990913
Please rebase
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment
michael-o commented on pull request #427:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/427#issuecomment-758087966
Since I don't know the implications of this I requested @rfscholte and
@khmarbaise to review this.
This is an aut
michael-o commented on pull request #427:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/427#issuecomment-756197574
>
>
> All (*-latestest, 11) ITS fail in the same spot unrelated to the patch.
>
> It appears it can't find `java.util.Objects` which was added in `1.7`,
this is very
