michael-o commented on pull request #645:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/645#issuecomment-1053634921
@cstamas @gnodet @hboutemy Any objections in general?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
michael-o commented on pull request #645:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/645#issuecomment-1053610312
Do you see this for 3.8.x as well?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
michael-o commented on pull request #645:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/645#issuecomment-1053578715
Alright. Will check later.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spe
michael-o commented on pull request #645:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/645#issuecomment-1053532716
Is this one still relevant regarding the changes done on MPLUGIN?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
michael-o commented on pull request #645:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/645#issuecomment-1041411056
No, not yet. Ping me in a week.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
michael-o commented on pull request #645:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/645#issuecomment-1005505425
> > Introduce a maven-repository-metadata-builder module
>
> Done in
[d39be11](https://github.com/apache/maven/commit/d39be11613d20228a4e826302ef57adf19ba1194).
This modul
michael-o commented on pull request #645:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/645#issuecomment-1005105026
>
Correct, we pointlessly waste cycles for their generation. This applies to a
lot of stuff we do.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respo
michael-o commented on pull request #645:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/645#issuecomment-1004330642
I support @cstamas position.
> > So, IMO maven-repository-metadata getting added components is wrong IMHO.
>
> Any suggestion where to add the default validation modu
michael-o commented on pull request #645:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/645#issuecomment-1004273279
> Metadata is only partially handled inside Maven (core), mostly it is now
handled transparently in [Maven
Resolver](https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/blob/master/maven-re
michael-o commented on pull request #645:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/645#issuecomment-1003778248
@kwin Insane! Please open a new JIRA issue for this. I am thinking whether
we can introduce this in 3.8.x or must wait at least until 3.9.x. We have a lot
of talks about validato
michael-o commented on pull request #645:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/645#issuecomment-1003603066
I don't have access to the NEXUS issue :-(
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
michael-o commented on pull request #645:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/645#issuecomment-1003602899
> Both issues are correct but are rather follow-ups to
[MNG-7375](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7375). My question is
about how to deal with a missing prefix within `
michael-o commented on pull request #645:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/645#issuecomment-1003586710
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscri
michael-o commented on pull request #645:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/645#issuecomment-1001510028
This PR hides the fact that the input data is invalid. Obviously, we need a
`MetadataValidator`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
14 matches
Mail list logo
