rmannibucau commented on PR #756:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/756#issuecomment-1162714124
@cstamas no, mvnd log interactive and cool but on CI - where -T is very
important - you just get the same than plain mvn and, exactly as for gradle,
you don't want the daemon on CI too. S
rmannibucau commented on PR #756:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/756#issuecomment-1162707105
@mthmulders and does this impl solves the issue for quarkus? For me it does
not seem so since the printed info is already thread in single threaded build
(plugins already list the folder
rmannibucau commented on PR #756:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/756#issuecomment-1162178246
@cstamas exactly, using easy to get and very convention friendly builds we
already hit issues, was the only point.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respon
rmannibucau commented on PR #756:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/756#issuecomment-1162093910
> I don't understand
Using one logger per concern we get the needed info at will and we dont have
the over-verbose output issue anymore so it enables more data injection user
could
rmannibucau commented on PR #756:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/756#issuecomment-1161988690
> drop pom.xml: are we so constrained that we start complexifying?
Guess that to be fair it should be asked both ways, is current verbosity
worth it and holding any information? Les
rmannibucau commented on PR #756:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/756#issuecomment-1160792385
> You mean show dir only?
When descriptor name is the default one yes.
About the ellipsis: it is better but fails to reach its goal for the
mentionned projects then so I'd re
rmannibucau commented on PR #756:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/756#issuecomment-1160759508
Hi guys, a few comments as an user:
. Can be neat to drop pom.xml (when "pom.xml"), takes space without more info
. Can it be an option or -X/logger flag? In several multimodules
