Tibor17 commented on issue #257: [SUREFIRE-1727] junitplatform: handle all
containers
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/257#issuecomment-578341085
Closed in favor of #267 .
This is an automated message from
Tibor17 commented on issue #257: [SUREFIRE-1727] junitplatform: handle all
containers
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/257#issuecomment-560183773
@t-8ch
Do you have time for this? How are you doing with the tests?
Tibor17 commented on issue #257: [SUREFIRE-1727] junitplatform: handle all
containers
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/257#issuecomment-559434517
@t-8ch
no no, it is a class with `@BeforeAll`. Feel free to add a test in this PR.
I will open new PR for the second
Tibor17 commented on issue #257: [SUREFIRE-1727] junitplatform: handle all
containers
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/257#issuecomment-559317708
@t-8ch
We have a similar issue
[SUREFIRE-1688](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1688) which
happens when
Tibor17 commented on issue #257: [SUREFIRE-1727] junitplatform: handle all
containers
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/257#issuecomment-559186761
no problem.
Question: this change you have made includes also the name of method too? So
when I see the native report in
Tibor17 commented on issue #257: [SUREFIRE-1727] junitplatform: handle all
containers
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/257#issuecomment-559184403
Maybe keep this PR for the future motivation in SUREFIRE-1724 and open a new
one PR for SUREFIRE-1727. oki?
Tibor17 commented on issue #257: [SUREFIRE-1727] junitplatform: handle all
containers
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/257#issuecomment-559183371
@t-8ch
I want to make sure that we are on the same line. Is Cucumber exotic engine
for you?
If it is then we can make
Tibor17 commented on issue #257: [SUREFIRE-1727] junitplatform: handle all
containers
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/257#issuecomment-559181429
Now i know what you mean but this is the same in JUnit4.
It works there.
Suppose that the Runner of JUnit4 fails and the
Tibor17 commented on issue #257: [SUREFIRE-1727] junitplatform: handle all
containers
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/257#issuecomment-559179089
@t-8ch
but your requirement to support all engines is covered already in
