slawekjaranowski commented on pull request #500:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/500#issuecomment-1082806125
Ok, thanks.
I assume that now is ok.
So when build have finished I will merge it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond t
slawekjaranowski commented on pull request #500:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/500#issuecomment-1081652953
Now with newer version of `testng-engine` is better I think.
Simply can be used with the newest `junit-jupiter-api:5.8.2` and simple
configuration should be sh
slawekjaranowski commented on pull request #500:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/500#issuecomment-1081403804
@Tibor17
Ok, I removed additional test, and use only existing.
I think that exclusions in most of time it is workaround for problem in
target project.
slawekjaranowski commented on pull request #500:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/500#issuecomment-1079988983
Ok, It is only improvement and can be postpone to a later release.
But we should know that can generate issues for as, like
[SUREFIRE-2043](https://issues.apach
slawekjaranowski commented on pull request #500:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/500#issuecomment-1079984393
Another radical proposition, drop this it tests at all, `testng-engine` it
is not our product it is extension for junit-platform.
So mention in documentati