[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Christian Schulte updated MRESOLVER-8:
--------------------------------------
    Summary: Mode selection (transitive vs. direct) implemented inconsistently 
accross 'ScopeDependencySelector' and 'OptionalDependencySelector'.  (was: 
Direct dependencies incorrectly detected as transitive.)

> Mode selection (transitive vs. direct) implemented inconsistently accross 
> 'ScopeDependencySelector' and 'OptionalDependencySelector'.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MRESOLVER-8
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-8
>             Project: Maven Resolver
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Christian Schulte
>            Assignee: Christian Schulte
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: Maven Artifact Resolver 1.2.0
>
>
> The classes 'ScopeDependencySelector' and 'OptionalDependencySelector' 
> inconsistently detected the mode of operation (direct or transitive). Whereas 
> the 'ScopeDependencySelector' honours the kind of resolution having been 
> requested (dependency vs. POM), the 'OptionalDependencySelector' does not 
> honour this difference. As both classes implement the 'DependencySelector', 
> they should select the mode of operation (direct vs. transitive) consistently.
> This is what things looked liked before the fix:
> {panel:title=ScopeDependencySelector}
> {code}
> public DependencySelector deriveChildSelector( DependencyCollectionContext 
> context )
> {
>     if ( this.transitive || context.getDependency() == null )
>     {
>         return this;
>     }
>     return new ScopeDependencySelector( true, included, excluded );
> }
> {code}
> {panel}
> {panel:title=OptionalDependencySelector}
> {code}
> public DependencySelector deriveChildSelector( DependencyCollectionContext 
> context )
> {
>     if ( depth >= 2 )
>     {
>         return this;
>     }
>     return new OptionalDependencySelector( depth + 1 );
> }
> {code}
> {panel}
> This is what both classes look like after the fix. No difference in mode 
> selection any more.
> {panel:title=ScopeDependencySelector}
> {code}
> public DependencySelector deriveChildSelector( DependencyCollectionContext 
> context )
> {
>     ScopeDependencySelector child = this;
>     if ( context.getDependency() != null && !child.transitive )
>     {
>         child = new ScopeDependencySelector( true, this.included, 
> this.excluded );
>     }
>     if ( context.getDependency() == null && child.transitive )
>     {
>         child = new ScopeDependencySelector( false, this.included, 
> this.excluded );
>     }
>     return child;
> }
> {code}
> {panel}
> {panel:title=OptionalDependencySelector}
> {code}
> public DependencySelector deriveChildSelector( DependencyCollectionContext 
> context )
> {
>     OptionalDependencySelector child = this;
>     if ( context.getDependency() != null && !child.transitive )
>     {
>         child = new OptionalDependencySelector( true );
>     }
>     if ( context.getDependency() == null && child.transitive )
>     {
>         child = new OptionalDependencySelector( false );
>     }
>     return child;
> }
> {code}
> {panel}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to