[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=164557#action_164557
]
Alex Rau commented on MWAR-33:
--
Paul
I agree with you that this could be more under control of the war
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=163848#action_163848
]
Alex Rau commented on MWAR-33:
--
Good news.
I looks to me as I was able to work around the issue. After a
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=164052#action_164052
]
Paul Benedict commented on MWAR-33:
---
Alex, the workaround described above works. Simply exclude
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=163567#action_163567
]
Alex Rau commented on MWAR-33:
--
Huge show stopper for us. We extend a 3rd party product and the current
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=154264#action_154264
]
Paul Benedict commented on MWAR-33:
---
My project team gets hit by this at least twice a week. Please
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_112431
]
Stephane Nicoll commented on MWAR-33:
-
Having the ability to deploy the server-side code is actually a good idea and I
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_111241
]
Joerg Schaible commented on MWAR-33:
We fight with this problem also. Currently we use warExcludes and redeclare all
the
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_53
]
Stephane Nicoll commented on MWAR-33:
-
Scott, we would like to have this as well but this needs a heavy change in the
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_87767
]
Scott Ryan commented on MWAR-33:
This is a huge showstopper for us. We have a number of WAR projects that
include 1-5 other
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=comments#action_80829 ]
mark struberg commented on MWAR-33:
---
I also discovered this problem today in a production environment.
Thanks to the various exclude mechanisms this is easy to fix. But
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=comments#action_73595 ]
Carlos Sanchez commented on MWAR-33:
Workaround:
Using latest version in svn you can do
dependentWarExcludesWEB-INF/lib/**/dependentWarExcludes
to avoid the jars from
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=comments#action_71877 ]
Andres Bernasconi commented on MWAR-33:
---
I believe this is a blocker too. In my (automatically generated) WEB-INF/lib
dir I have duplicate jar files with different
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=comments#action_67907 ]
Olivier Lamy commented on MWAR-33:
--
Why not using Set artifacts = project.getArtifacts();
And get dependencies of the artifacts with type war.
But I think in case of war type transitive
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=comments#action_67803 ]
Brett Porter commented on MWAR-33:
--
confirmed regression since beta-2
jars with differents versions can be in WEB-INF/lib with war as dependencies
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=comments#action_67810 ]
Brett Porter commented on MWAR-33:
--
ok, it took me a bit to realise this was because the war is being unpacked.
You should use warExclude for now.
This is a much bigger change that
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=comments#action_65603 ]
Olivier Lamy commented on MWAR-33:
--
Other tests made which causes some troubles.
My pom has a dependency to a SNAPSHOT dependecy (in example called foo).
An included war dependency has
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=comments#action_65000 ]
Olivier Lamy commented on MWAR-33:
--
No agree with this.
IMO the content of WEB-INF/lib must populated with the dependencies section of
the pom.
With this you are sure to have the same
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=comments#action_64888 ]
Marvin King commented on MWAR-33:
-
i guess this is a problem. =) maybe you can add an warExclude entry for the
unneeded log4j
jars with differents versions can be in WEB-INF/lib
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-33?page=comments#action_64889 ]
Marvin King commented on MWAR-33:
-
s/an/a/g
jars with differents versions can be in WEB-INF/lib with war as dependencies
19 matches
Mail list logo
