[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=195391#action_195391
]
Jose Negreira commented on SUREFIRE-121:
Hi all, I've tried a cleaner workaround:
This was
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=193293#action_193293
]
Frédéric Camblor commented on SUREFIRE-121:
---
+1
In a Test framework we've made, we're exe
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=174824#action_174824
]
sridhar commented on SUREFIRE-121:
--
Any workaround on this issue? i'm encountering same problem an
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=160441#action_160441
]
Dan Tran commented on SUREFIRE-121:
---
I think I have a work around, may be cumbersome for some ppl
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=160354#action_160354
]
Dan Tran commented on SUREFIRE-121:
---
maven 2.1-M1 may have fixed it, could someone confirm?
> Sy
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=160356#action_160356
]
Dan Tran commented on SUREFIRE-121:
---
btw, could some one provide a small pom to prove it?
> Syst
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=160349#action_160349
]
Chico Charlesworth commented on SUREFIRE-121:
-
This bug is preventing us from using 2.
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=156498#action_156498
]
Gin-Ting Chen commented on SUREFIRE-121:
I'm also interested in what happens in this bug.
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=146121#action_146121
]
Christian Nelson commented on SUREFIRE-121:
---
Just Confirming... with maven 2.0.9 and 2.0
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_120747
]
Milos Kleint commented on SUREFIRE-121:
---
Unfortunately most components/classes in Maven have no javadoc, MavenSession
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_120689
]
Dan Fabulich commented on SUREFIRE-121:
---
This hotfix switches from using System.getProperties to using
MavenSession.
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_120661
]
Milos Kleint commented on SUREFIRE-121:
---
fixed the embedded use problem.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=613539&vie
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_120309
]
Milos Kleint commented on SUREFIRE-121:
---
I believe pushing the System.getProperties() to a forked process is wrong
g
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_120293
]
Milos Kleint commented on SUREFIRE-121:
---
MavenSession.getExecutionProperties() shall be the preferred call to
System
14 matches
Mail list logo