Rob Moran created NIFI-3374:
---
Summary: Improve Messaging and Awareness
Key: NIFI-3374
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3374
Project: Apache NiFi
Issue Type: Improvement
R
Github user brosander commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1427
reviewing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830004#comment-15830004
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3158:
--
Github user brosander commented on the issue:
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1430
@jvwing Thanks for the prompt review!
I certainly don't mind having a more comprehensive review of the current
behavior. The initial stab at the PR was simply trying to address the confusing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830006#comment-15830006
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3301:
--
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1428
Thanks for starting all this modularization @scottyaslan! This looks mostly
good but I have a couple comments.
In nf-canvas.js, the loading of the cluster summary has been moved to
before th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830157#comment-15830157
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3359:
--
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1429
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Aslan updated NIFI-3291:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
> UI - Upgrade jQuery
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830173#comment-15830173
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3291:
--
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user scottyaslan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1429
Thanks @mcgilman this has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830175#comment-15830175
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3291:
--
Github user scottyaslan commented on the issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830169#comment-15830169
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on NIFI-3291:
---
Commit e62ee
Joseph Percivall created NIFI-3375:
--
Summary: Add a option expiration/timeout for idle connections to
SocketChannelDispatcher
Key: NIFI-3375
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3375
Proje
Github user jvwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1430
@mcgilman Your argument for consistency is very persuasive, and I would
agree that adding the move/grab cursor is inconsistent. A brief comparison
with the flow canvas:
- Arrow/default cursor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830291#comment-15830291
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3301:
--
Github user jvwing commented on the issue:
GitHub user apsaltis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1433
NIFI-2615 Adding support for GetTCP processor
This is a major refactoring of a previous version of this processor that
was never merged due to poor design. Special thanks to @olegz for all of his
h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830477#comment-15830477
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2615:
--
GitHub user apsaltis opened a pull request:
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1420
@ijokarumawak this is really awesome stuff! Tested this out and working
nicely, code looks great. I made a couple of small tweaks to the documentation
on the processors, going to merge to master shortl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830503#comment-15830503
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3216:
--
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1430
Sounds good. I've made the changes. However, I'm going to hold off on
pushing the update since it'll conflict with some changes that I'm reviewing in
another PR (#1428) with someone else. Once that i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830516#comment-15830516
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3301:
--
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1420
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bryan Bende updated NIFI-3216:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
> Add ability to wait for N signals to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830537#comment-15830537
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on NIFI-3216:
---
Commit 7f017
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bryan Bende updated NIFI-3216:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0
> Add ability to wait for N signals to Wait/Notify processors
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830538#comment-15830538
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3216:
--
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Aslan reopened NIFI-3291:
---
So I found another set of issues caused by the more precise .innerWidth() and
.innerHeight() in the new ve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830549#comment-15830549
]
Andrew Psaltis commented on NIFI-3354:
--
[~ozhurakousky] Are you currently working on t
Github user mosermw commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1433
Nice contribution, @apsaltis. Does this need to be in its own
nifi-gettcp-bundle? PutTCP is in the nifi-standard-bundle and I would expect
GetTCP and PutTCP to be located in the same NAR.
---
If you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830559#comment-15830559
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2615:
--
Github user mosermw commented on the issue:
Github user apsaltis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1433
@mosermw -- I can totally see how this processor would be at home in the
same NAR, the reasoning for keeping it separate was to have one less processor
to modify and hopefully ease the effort to inte
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830566#comment-15830566
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2615:
--
Github user apsaltis commented on the issue:
Michael Moser created NIFI-3376:
---
Summary: Implement content repository ResourceClaim compaction
Key: NIFI-3376
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3376
Project: Apache NiFi
Issue T
Github user mosermw commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1433
That's definitely a fair reason. I believe this would be the first NAR
whose name contains the name of a processor. Would you consider changing the
name to nifi-tcp-bundle and nifi-tcp-nar? When th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830656#comment-15830656
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2615:
--
Github user mosermw commented on the issue:
Github user olegz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1433
@mosermw +1 to the name change!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830659#comment-15830659
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2615:
--
Github user olegz commented on the issue:
Github user gauravgoyal86 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1372#discussion_r96966950
--- Diff: nifi-docker/1.1.1/DockerRun.sh ---
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+DOCKER_IMAGE="$(cat DockerImage.txt)"
+docker run -it -d -p 8080:80
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830674#comment-15830674
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3260:
--
Github user gauravgoyal86 commented on a diff
Github user apsaltis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1433
@mosermw Changing the name certainly makes sense to me. Honestly had not
dawned on my that it was the first processor whose name matches the nar.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830681#comment-15830681
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2615:
--
Github user apsaltis commented on the issue:
Matthew Clarke created NIFI-3377:
Summary: NiFi RPG errors when switching between transport
protocols.
Key: NIFI-3377
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3377
Project: Apache NiFi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830730#comment-15830730
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2615:
--
Github user apsaltis closed the pull request a
Github user apsaltis closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1433
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user jfrazee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1422#discussion_r96983531
--- Diff: nifi-assembly/pom.xml ---
@@ -19,6 +19,10 @@ language governing permissions and limitations under the
License. -->
nifi-assembly
po
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830820#comment-15830820
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3015:
--
Github user jfrazee commented on a diff in the
GitHub user apsaltis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1434
NIFI-2615 Adding GetTCP processor
This nar provides a GetTCP processor in a generic TCP bundle. This is an
update based on the previous P/R [1] feedback for this nar.
[1] https://gith
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830826#comment-15830826
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2615:
--
GitHub user apsaltis opened a pull request:
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1422#discussion_r96984003
--- Diff: nifi-assembly/pom.xml ---
@@ -19,6 +19,10 @@ language governing permissions and limitations under the
License. -->
nifi-assembly
po
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830827#comment-15830827
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3015:
--
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the
Github user jfrazee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1312
@kedarchitale I'm going to try picking up the review on this so we can get
this done. Thanks for already making all the changes Joe suggested!
I have two questions now. First, do you think the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830859#comment-15830859
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3147:
--
Github user jfrazee commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Kawamura updated NIFI-3373:
Description:
Currently we can limit the number of flow.xml.gz archive files by:
* total archive size
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Kawamura updated NIFI-3373:
Description:
Currently we can limit the number of flow.xml.gz archive files by:
* total archive size
Ryan Persaud created NIFI-3378:
--
Summary: PutKafka retries flowfiles that are too large instead of
routing them to failure
Key: NIFI-3378
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3378
Project: Apa
56 matches
Mail list logo
