[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16101176#comment-16101176
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4215:
--
Github user jvwing commented on the issue:
Github user jvwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2034
@Wesley-Lawrence Thanks for putting this PR together. I am still reviewing
- the only immediate feedback I can give is that I would prefer not to update
the checkstyle definition in pom.xml as part of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ben updated NIFI-4228:
--
Description:
the new PutDatabaseRecord processor currently has a bug that fails to support
the 'Ignore Unmatched Fields'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ben updated NIFI-4228:
--
Description:
the new PutDatabaseRecord processor currently has a bug that fails to support
the 'Ignore Unmatched Fields'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ben updated NIFI-4228:
--
Summary: PutDatabaseRecord Processor fail to support 'Ignore Unmatched
Fields' (was: PutDatabaseRecord Processor fail to
ben created NIFI-4228:
-
Summary: PutDatabaseRecord Processor fail to support 'Unmatched
Field Behavior'
Key: NIFI-4228
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4228
Project: Apache NiFi
Issue Typ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16101087#comment-16101087
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4212:
--
Github user mans2singh commented on the issue:
Github user mans2singh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2030
Hi @jvwing - Thanks for your feedback and recommendations.
I used EL support for returning changed document attribute to give the use
the flexibility to make the decision globally or per do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16101078#comment-16101078
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4215:
--
Github user jvwing commented on the issue:
Github user jvwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2034
Reviewing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100903#comment-16100903
]
Andy LoPresto commented on NIFI-4221:
-
I almost updated the code to perform unit reduct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy LoPresto updated NIFI-4221:
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
> Print app startup in human-reada
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100876#comment-16100876
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4221:
--
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100877#comment-16100877
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4221:
--
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100875#comment-16100875
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on NIFI-4221:
---
Commit 759f8
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2038
Ran `contrib-check` and verified output in logs. +1, merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2038
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100849#comment-16100849
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4221:
--
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2038
Reviewing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Burgess reassigned NIFI-3335:
--
Assignee: Matt Burgess
> GenerateTableFetch should allow you to specify an initial Max Value
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Burgess reassigned NIFI-3335:
--
Assignee: (was: Matt Burgess)
> GenerateTableFetch should allow you to specify an initial Ma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100685#comment-16100685
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3335:
--
GitHub user mattyb149 opened a pull request:
GitHub user mattyb149 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2039
NIFI-3335: Add initial.maxvalue support to GenerateTableFetch
Moved the common code back to the abstract base class
### For all changes:
- [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Villard updated NIFI-4221:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Print app startup in human-readable time
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100614#comment-16100614
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4221:
--
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2038
Output:
2017-07-25 21:26:26,920 INFO [main] org.apache.nifi.nar.NarUnpacker NAR
loading process took 10642628574 nanoseconds (10 seconds).
2017-07-25 21:26:49,417 INFO [main] org.ap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100613#comment-16100613
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4221:
--
GitHub user pvillard31 opened a pull request:
GitHub user pvillard31 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2038
NIFI-4221 - Print app startup in human-readable time
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100515#comment-16100515
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4181:
--
Github user Wesley-Lawrence commented on the i
Github user Wesley-Lawrence commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2003
@markap14 @mattyb149 Is there any other feedback you'd two like me to
address?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Burgess reassigned NIFI-3335:
--
Assignee: Matt Burgess
> GenerateTableFetch should allow you to specify an initial Max Value
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100360#comment-16100360
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2528:
--
Github user joewitt commented on the issue:
Github user joewitt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1986
Some thoughts on this thread. First it is good to get this cleaned up and
easier for the user so this is a great discussion.
1. It sounds prudent that we delineate our SSLContextService along
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Villard reassigned NIFI-4221:
Assignee: Pierre Villard
> Print app startup in human-readable time
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100261#comment-16100261
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4217:
--
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Villard updated NIFI-4217:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.4.0
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
>
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2036
+1, code LGTM, build OK, merging to master, thanks @mattyb149 !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100256#comment-16100256
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on NIFI-4217:
---
Commit 9a5d4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100257#comment-16100257
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4217:
--
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2036
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100246#comment-16100246
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4217:
--
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2036
Reviewing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Villard updated NIFI-4227:
-
Attachment: TestForkRecord.xml
Attaching a template that can be used to test the processor.
> Crea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Villard updated NIFI-4227:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Create a ForkRecord processor
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100235#comment-16100235
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4227:
--
GitHub user pvillard31 opened a pull request:
GitHub user pvillard31 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2037
NIFI-4227 - add a ForkRecord processor
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Villard resolved NIFI-4226.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
It seems to have been created twice. Closing as duplicate. Can be deleted.
Pierre Villard created NIFI-4226:
Summary: Create a ForkRecord processor
Key: NIFI-4226
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4226
Project: Apache NiFi
Issue Type: New Feature
Pierre Villard created NIFI-4227:
Summary: Create a ForkRecord processor
Key: NIFI-4227
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4227
Project: Apache NiFi
Issue Type: New Feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100071#comment-16100071
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2528:
--
Github user m-hogue commented on the issue:
Github user m-hogue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1986
@alopresto @jskora : So i mentioned above that there were two reasons why I
opted for this approach. Previous to this PR and confirmed by @alopresto and
@trkurc, the protocol used by ListenHTTP was au
Mark Payne created NIFI-4225:
Summary: Processors should not be able to be moved to Parent Group
if referencing Controller Service in current Group
Key: NIFI-4225
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4225
Mark Payne created NIFI-4224:
Summary: Add Variable Registry at Process Group level
Key: NIFI-4224
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4224
Project: Apache NiFi
Issue Type: New Featur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFIREG-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16099962#comment-16099962
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFIREG-5:
--
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/2
NIFIREG-5: Initial implementation of nifi-registry-flow-data-model; iâ¦
â¦t will likely need significant updating before release time but this
will get the ball rolling so that we can integr
Mark Payne created NIFIREG-5:
Summary: Develop data model that can be shared by nifi and
nifi-registry
Key: NIFIREG-5
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFIREG-5
Project: NiFi Registry
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16099908#comment-16099908
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2528:
--
Github user jskora commented on the issue:
Github user jskora commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1986
I don't want to complicate this, but I feel like I must be missing
something.
As much as possible, the validation at configuration time should provide
the user feedback, not failure upon exe
Mark Heydenrych created NIFI-4223:
-
Summary: Batching in ListFile processor
Key: NIFI-4223
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4223
Project: Apache NiFi
Issue Type: Improvement
59 matches
Mail list logo
