Github user josephxsxn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2999
Thanks for helping with this @MikeThomsen, Our dev team spent a long time
trying to understand exactly how to use the processor and so we hope these
clarifications will save someone else
Github user josephxsxn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2999
@alopresto Thanks Andy :) nice to hear that changed, I always thought it
was tedious to squash things.
---
Github user josephxsxn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2999
Thanks for submitting this documentation change. Can you please squash all
3 of your commits into 1?
https://github.com/todotxt/todo.txt-android/wiki/Squash-All-Commits-Related
Github user josephxsxn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1800
1) I'll look into taking the inner classes out but will need to look at how
the permissions scopes are working between them first.
2) Will look into applying the KeeperException recommendation
GitHub user josephxsxn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1800
NIFI-3681 - Controller Service for Processor Leader Elections
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
Github user josephxsxn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1796
Using today and is preventing the errors as expected.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user josephxsxn closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1583
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user josephxsxn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1583
Closed in light of Joes comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user josephxsxn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1747
Builds fine passed check-style. Tests pass. License headers exist. Tested
on my custom workflow with success.
Please rebase master from upstream and squash your 11 commits into 1
Github user josephxsxn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1747
I think you just need a entry in your pom in the toolkit-assembly now and
ull be all done :D
Looks like it works well. Will test on some other clusters just to validate
diversity
Github user josephxsxn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1747
works great now on multiple differing flow.xml.gz's... I am thinking that
perhaps we should include the min/max/avg flow files per queue as well just in
case some users decides to set
Github user josephxsxn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1747
Test fails when building Looks trivial see below. Also built it with
skipTests anyway just to run it again, on 1 Cluster I am getting a null
Github user josephxsxn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1747
ignore my java -cp // java jar comments..
Can you mimic what the other existing tools do here with .bin and .sh
scripts ?
https://github.com/apache/nifi/tree/master/nifi-toolkit
Github user josephxsxn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1747
Also would it be possible to change the packaging so that it builds its in
a 'java jar' manor so the admin doesnt have to go lookup the entire classname
to run the utility?
---
If your project
Github user josephxsxn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1747
I went and built this, you have alot of checkstyle issues -
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.15:check (check-style) on
project nifi
GitHub user josephxsxn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1617
NIFI-3640 uri eventhub changes
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps
Github user josephxsxn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1583
Trival change in names didnt impact tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user josephxsxn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1583
NIFI-1131 renamed relationships
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps
GitHub user josephxsxn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1556
NIFI-3547 Wait Processor should not WARN for expected behavior
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
19 matches
Mail list logo
