adamfisher commented on pull request #3317:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3317#issuecomment-716745290
Yeah I like where you're headed with that. Are you thinking hashing across
data sets would be the hashing implementation? Then we would have a
separate detective wicked reco
adamfisher commented on pull request #3317:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3317#issuecomment-716726587
The cache key identifier could be used to identify the grouping of the data
set and used as a key prefix. It sounds like it's just a matter of how we store
record level hashes.
adamfisher commented on pull request #3317:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3317#issuecomment-716163041
It's been a while since we discussed this so I'm not familiar with the uuid
strategy. if you are talking about the uuid on a flow file then that could be
specified using the cac
adamfisher commented on pull request #3317:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3317#issuecomment-715482458
I'm sorry but I don't know what to use for the patch file. Total newb to git
when it comes to these more advanced scenarios.
--
adamfisher commented on pull request #3317:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3317#issuecomment-714820284
Last I remember getting the tests running but it was really hard to get the
whole framework to build. It's super close. Please let me know if you need
anything. I did add commit
adamfisher commented on pull request #3317:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3317#issuecomment-651851517
@MikeThomsen I tried following your steps for rebasing and I thought it all
went ok but I seem to have a lot more commits now. Would you be able to advise?
I'm not a git expert.
